Ads
Tom's Guide > Forum > Linux/Free BSD > General Discussion > Computer required for image processing

Computer required for image processing

Forum Linux/Free BSD : General Discussion Computer required for image processing

Word :    Username :           
 

Get Quote: Sun Blade 1500 Workstation

I am a PHd Research Student in need of processing power using the following spec:

OS: Linux Ubuntu/Mint
Processor: i7 Core
Memory: 4GB DDR
Storage: 1TB Hard disk drive
Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Monitor: 24-bit X display place depth

Primary Application: SeaDas image processing software of 250M resolution data

P.S. I've been told the A29-PT2-9C-1GMAJN Sun Blade 2000 Workstation might have to processing capacity to do the job would greatly value your information.

are there more efficient systems in terms of price and power that can still deliver quicker image processing?

Reply to everblessed25
Register or log in to remove.

I might be wrong here but having had a look at the SeaDas page there doesn't seem to be a version for Solaris or for the SPARC processor(s) which the Sun Blade 2000 workstation come with. To my eyes it looks like you just want more of what you have, basically a decent specification x86 based workstation. The good new is that you're likely to get more for your money this way than by buying Sun hardware. Don't get me wrong they make some lovely kit, but it is a little premium.

I assume you're running analysis on your existing HW at the moment and simply want faster results. It's hard to advise unless we know where the bottle neck is at the moment. I'd guess memory as 4Gb is not really that much when dealing with large data sets. This might be causing you to use more swap space which will be slow, I'd expect that a RAID array would be something to look at. The i7 series are quick, nothing else out there really competing with it at the moment. You could look at dedicated workstations with two or more CPU sockets and running the Inter Xeon or AMD Optertron range of CPU's. This might however be a bit pointless unless the SeaDas software is written to support multiple cores. I've not seen mention of it on the SeaDas site (I did only have a quick look) but they might have support for GPU's through things like CUDA, basically allowing you to use the graphics card to process data.

I'd suggest you're going to be best talking to SeaDas directly or other users of that platform for clarification on what does and does not help. Once you know that people here and in the HW section will have lots of suggestions on what will give you the best price performance.

Reply to audiovoodoo

Adding to what audiovoodoo has recommended . . .

SeaDas looks like GIS for oceans, to me.

Processing color satellite scenes can be safely limited to 256 colors and still require a lot from the best GPU ( http://www.renderosity.com/nvidia- [...] -cms-15832 ) your budget can afford.

Next in priority would be hard drive read-write speeds (see http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,2600.html ) with more smaller-capacity hard drives being preferable to one or two higher-capacity hard drives of at least 7200RPM, especially in a RAID setup (six, both mirrored and striped being an ideal I have not witnessed) unless your budget can afford a couple Velociraptors;

and, thirdly, up the RAM to at least 8GB low-latency non-buffered RAM.

Best wishes!

Reply to chamaecyparis
TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Tom's Guide > Forum > Linux/Free BSD > General Discussion > Computer required for image processing
Go to:

There are 46 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Tom's Guide around the World