|
Page :
1
2
Previous
|
|
| Author |
Thread : Need some help with SATAII Drive
|
|
More Information
|
I just bought a 250GB Western Digital hard drive, Model WD2500KS, and I can't get windows to boot from it. At first I installed it and booted from my IDE drive, then ran the DataLifeguard software from within windows. It set up my system to recognize hard drives over 132GB, restarted, then I copied my entire boot drive (IDE) to the new SATA drive. I unplugged both IDE drives, and tried to boot from the new SATA drive, but it would not do it. I plugged my IDE drives back in, with the SATA drive still plugged in, and it would not boot at all. I unplugged the IDE drives and installed windows xp pro from scratch on the SATA drive, but it still won't load the OS. What do I need to do to get this drive to boot? I have looked around my bios but can't find anything to tell the system to boot from the first SATA. My system specs should be in my sig. My bios version is version 1009, the newest, and I reinstalled it anyway. Sorry if this is a repeat problem.
|
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
First, there has to be somewhere in the BIOS to set the boot order. If there is no Boot section, it's likely in the Advanced setting some where around the Advance settings. Also check the mobo manual either the one came on with the mobo or online. I just got an ASUS K8N SLI and I had to make sure that the hdd with Windows was attached the the SATA 1 connection, as in the first SATA connection on the mobo. If you haven't done so, read the entire mobo manual on BIOS settings as well as hdd installation |
|
More Information
|
The hd is plugged in to the first sata connector. In the bios the boot device priority is hd first, then cd and removable, so that is correct. Is there supposed to be a jumper set on the drive itself? I have SSC, PM2, OPT1, OPT2, none are jumpered. I have gone through the manual book that came with the mobo and the pdf that I downloaded, and neither helped. I do not need to set up any type of RAID, and I just read that it should be jumpered for SSC, but now with or without the jumper the drive just softly clicks. Is this drive bad? Thanks. |
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
Well, the only options in the boot device priority are hard drive (does not specify which), CD-ROM, Removable, and LAN. Maybe somewhere else in the BIOS there is some way to tell it to boot off of SATA 1. I'll have to read through the manual again. I also heard and read about changing controllers, like the PATA and SATA controllers. I am not sure what this means or how to do this, so if anyone has info on this I would appreciate it. |
|
More Information
|
If you were able to install Windows on the SATA drive, it means the machine is recognizing the drive. Try unplugging the power cable all your other drives. If that doesn't work, PM me later to remind me to check my BIOS settings, I have the same mobo but in a different computer than the one I'm currently on. I'm lucky to remember my name sometimes, which is why I need the reminder. |
|
More Information
|
Couple ideas:
|
|
More Information
|
Very good info, thanks. I used the DataLifeguard tools to copy the entire old drive to the sata drive, and it did not boot. So I wrote a new MBR using the windows xp install disk and that did not do it. I will write a new MBR on this new install, as well as the other thing that can be done (I forgot what it is called right now) and see if that fixes it. Also I will plug in my old pata drives with the sata and see if I get options for which drive to boot from. Thanks. |
|
More Information
|
I have that same exact hard drive and installed window with no problems. One thing also to check is to see if your controller is SATA I or SATA II. If it is only a SATA I controller, see if you can get a BIOS update that will give you the better transfer ( my intel board had an update that also updated the controller ). If you can only use the controller as a SATA I controller then you need to make sure and put the jumper on the hard drive as a 150Mb transfer only. This will force the HDD to be a SATA I drive which it is NOT. This drive is a SATA II 300Mb transfer.
|
|
More Information
|
The controller is SATA II. One thing that I found in the manual is the access mode. Should this be set on 'auto' or 'large'? |
|
More Information
|
Probably set "Auto", but check the controller manual. I believe in mine it says that setting this to "Large" forces it to assume the HDD and OS are set to support large (i.e., over 137 GB) drives with the LBA48 protocol. Setting "Auto" means it will check and do that provided the support is there AND provided that the HDD was partitioned in a system that supports LBA48 - aparently there is info written to the disk about that. If the BIOS finds it cannot rely on LBA48 for large drive suport, then it is allowed under "Auto" to fall back to the lesser option. |
|
More Information
|
You're right - 'auto' is the one to use. 'Large' crashed the system right after boot. I am sitting right now looking through the BIOS, and the drive shows up along with my other two eide drives. Under the 'Boot' menu I have these sub-menu choices:
|
|
More Information
|
As I said, I have the same board and my BIOS is set the same as you have yours. Plus under Advance NVRAID Configuration is set to Diasabled, Onboard Device Configuration Silicon SATA Controller is set to Enabled, under SLI Configuraiton EZ-Plug Warning is Enabled, SLI Braodcastr Apperture is Disabled and A1-Selector is set to Automatic. My OS is on a SATA II connected to the SATA 1 on the mobo and have not had any problems getting into Windows. If the BIOS settings are identical, it really sounds like either the Windows installation is corrupt or a problem with the hdd. I would unplug all the other hdd while working on the problem? Did you install any of the RAD drivers on the ASUS CD? I didn't. |
|
More Information
|
Nope, no raid drivers. Did not need them since there is only one drive I want to use. I will try reinstalling XP on it and see if it boots. If not then I would have to assume the drive itself is bad. But that does not make sense because the XP installation recognizes and installs onto it.
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
|
