Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » 965 or 975 for Core Duo 2?
 




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Previous
Author
 Thread : 965 or 975 for Core Duo 2?
 
Drank maak my fokkol..
More Information

This is probably an over used topic, but can someone tell me which would be better, 965 or 975 for a Conroe cpu? Pricing isn't an issue, nor do I have specific needs.

The 975 had an alteration after April 2006, which allows it to handle the Conroe CPU - so it feels a bit suspect. With 965, I'm not sure what to expect.

If anyone can lift the veil for me, I'd be much obliged!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Isn't the motherboard you are looking for a 775 socket? You just have to make sure it supports conroe though and not to get it mixed up with older versions. The conroe boards still supports older 775 CPUs though.

Drank maak my fokkol..
More Information

Thanx for the reply. Maybe some m/b vendors will use iniative on the 965 and include pata connections - i hope so, cos i'm not aware of any other way to connect a dvd drive.... :D

More Information

Quote :

Thanx for the reply. Maybe some m/b vendors will use iniative on the 965 and include pata connections - i hope so, cos i'm not aware of any other way to connect a dvd drive.... :D

It's far from ideal, but you could use an ATA controller card.

More Information

Apparently theres problems with SATA optical drives being the default drive with XP or so BenQ claim. I'd imagine this won't be a problem with Vista so hopefully with vista we'll see the death of legacy sh!t like PATA and floppies.

More Information

Quote :



The alteration you refer to is the transition from VRM standard 10.0 (or maybe it was 10.3) to 11.0 standard. Effectively, the pre-Conroe ready 775 socket MBs adhered to a VRM standard that the lowest supplied voltage was too high to support Core 2, thus they need to rev the standard and re-work the boards to allow lower supply voltage.

Here is a link on how you can convert a pre-conroe board to a conroe capable board by simply adding a resistor in the right spot:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] hp?t=99298

Other than allowing lower supply voltages and refresh the bios code nothing else changed, there is nothing suspect to be concerned about.

Having said that, the 965 chipset is a great chipset advantage is that it officially supports DDR2-800. My beef with the 965 is the lack of PATA ports for optical drives, so I myself will opt for the 975 or the ATI RD600.

Jack



From what I have heard, the ICH8 on the 965 motherboards does have a PATA controller in the silicon but they would need to increase the package size to bond out the connections. This is causing most if not all motheroboard vendors to look for a seperate PATA controller. Intel is using a Marvell PATA controller on all of their 965 boards except their pico BTX boards which don't have the space to actually put one down.

More Information

Quote :

This is probably an over used topic, but can someone tell me which would be better, 965 or 975 for a Conroe cpu? Pricing isn't an issue, nor do I have specific needs.

The 975 had an alteration after April 2006, which allows it to handle the Conroe CPU - so it feels a bit suspect. With 965, I'm not sure what to expect.

If anyone can lift the veil for me, I'd be much obliged!




I would definitely go for a 965. it was designed for Core 2, and only certain revs of 975 will work.

The 965 boards are due to ship with Core 2 so there will be some around. The problem maybe a shortage of chips for awhile in retail.

More Information

The chips are already listing on sites as in stock...

http://www.eastluna.com/hardware/details.php?id=1954

More Information

ATi RD600.

Drank maak my fokkol..
More Information

Jeez - talk about upgrade headaches..... Thanx for all the input!!!

I've also found a liking in the 965 - seeing that it's designed for Conroe. Now I have to wait for August (Conroe only ships to S Africa then).

Good luck to all the France and Italian supporters!!! With Brazil out, I'll have to flip coins on whom to support.... :wink:

More Information

Quote :

Jeez - talk about upgrade headaches..... Thanx for all the input!!!

I've also found a liking in the 965 - seeing that it's designed for Conroe. Now I have to wait for August (Conroe only ships to S Africa then).



Like you, I have taken an early interest in the capabilities of the 965 chipset. I am very interested in the reviews/benchmarks that I expect to be published shortly. The memory controller of the 965 appears to have the potiential of outperforming the 975X.

I hope to see more sophisticated power/heat/noise management functions in the 965. :)

More Information

One of the most important items people have forgotten is the death of AC97 onboard sound with the 965. I can't belive it took so long.

More Information

If the 965 mobo has an IDE interface slot what happens when you plug in your PATA devices to it? Will the optical drives just not work?

Live Free or Die Hard!
More Information

I'd go for the 975...

More Information

Quote :

Having said that, the 965 chipset is a great chipset advantage is that it officially supports DDR2-800. My beef with the 965 is the lack of PATA ports for optical drives, so I myself will opt for the 975 or the ATI RD600.Jack



What does it mean to "officially" support DDR2-800? Won't a 975 support it? Is that the only advantage of the 965 over the 975?

I really do not know a lot about the intricate details with mobos, but I thought the PATA port was on the mobo where the cable from the IDE device plugs into it. This is not correct?

More Information
n°1141411
07-10-2006 at 07:23:42 PM <