Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » "MSI Laptops: Turion X2 vs Centrino Duo"
 

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2
Previous 
Author
 Thread : "MSI Laptops: Turion X2 vs Centrino Duo"
 
More Information

Quote :

After a little more than 6 months of presence on the market, Core Duo has us already to show all its capacities as well on the level of the performances as of autonomy. The potential buyers not having made their choice yet are extremely likely to await the arrival of the future generation of processors dual core for mobile platforms: Core 2 Duet, code name Merom. There are strong chances so that it is even more powerful and even less greedy in energy but he is likely to be sold a little expensive, which is already the case of Core Duo compared to Turion 64 x2. Moreover, this last is largely enough powerful to ensure you of many hours of production in all kinds, especially in a portable computer. Concerning Turion 64 x2, I must say that I expected all the same something of a little more, how to say, more “exotic”, more “new”. It is in fact nothing whole. It insipid, without any savour and especially left a little late after Core Duo what makes think of “heated”. Certe, the performances are there and it is about a very good processor for mobile platform the more so as the policy of consistent AMD to surround itself by many manufacturers of chipsets, WLAN, and others allows the manufacturers and assemblers a greater flexibility in their choices of components, but nothing made there, we have the unpleasant impression of “already considering”…

The principal interest of Turion 64 x2 at present remains the assumption of responsibility of the instructions 64 bits (from where the presence of the label Vista Capable) but especially its price like very often at AMD since compared with Core Duo, Turion 64 x2 is less expensive



Read the whole review and make your own conclusions. 8)

http://www.cowcotland.com/article149-1.html

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

I'm blocked whats the general consensus? Main thing I'd like to find out is power and battery life. Performance is notebooks is always limited by the hdd and vid card anyway. I have a 600M which I'd like to replace because the battery life is not the greatest thing in the world.

More Information

1) the comparison is between T2300(1.6GHz) and ML-56(1.8GHz).
2) the chart bars are fake. They are not starting from 0%, so compare only the numbers.
3) there is no performance/watt comparison

ToledoVirgin Licker's Club
More Information

Isn't that the shi77iest Duo in existance?

More Information

Quote :

Isn't that the shi77iest Duo in existance?


yeap, there is no more shittiest made yet. and there is only 1 model better than ML-56, the ML-60

ToledoVirgin Licker's Club
More Information

Quote :

Isn't that the shi77iest Duo in existance?


yeap, there is no more shittiest made yet. and there is only 1 model better than ML-56, the ML-60 Forgive me, I worded it incorrectly. I don't really like Core Duo, it sucks. Cre 2 Duo, however, does not.

More Information

Quote :

After a little more than 6 months of presence on the market, Core Duo has us already to show all its capacities as well on the level of the performances as of autonomy. The potential buyers not having made their choice yet are extremely likely to await the arrival of the future generation of processors dual core for mobile platforms: Core 2 Duet, code name Merom. There are strong chances so that it is even more powerful and even less greedy in energy but he is likely to be sold a little expensive, which is already the case of Core Duo compared to Turion 64 x2. Moreover, this last is largely enough powerful to ensure you of many hours of production in all kinds, especially in a portable computer. Concerning Turion 64 x2, I must say that I expected all the same something of a little more, how to say, more “exotic”, more “new”. It is in fact nothing whole. It insipid, without any savour and especially left a little late after Core Duo what makes think of “heated”. Certe, the performances are there and it is about a very good processor for mobile platform the more so as the policy of consistent AMD to surround itself by many manufacturers of chipsets, WLAN, and others allows the manufacturers and assemblers a greater flexibility in their choices of components, but nothing made there, we have the unpleasant impression of “already considering”…

The principal interest of Turion 64 x2 at present remains the assumption of responsibility of the instructions 64 bits (from where the presence of the label Vista Capable) but especially its price like very often at AMD since compared with Core Duo, Turion 64 x2 is less expensive



Read the whole review and make your own conclusions. 8)

[url=http://www.cowcotland.com/article149-1.html]http://www.cowcotland.

com/article149-1.html[/url]


Ah yes, Mr. 9 inch and his fud. Well, here we go again and i'll sum it up lightly for you. Intel is more expensive because once again, they make a complete integrated platform. Everybody knows or should at least know by now, that Intel chipsets are not cheap. Why is this? Because they're good and IMO better than nVidia or ATI's chipsets. (we're talking mobile platform)

Face it, Intel has the best mobile platform out there right now and will continue to do so into the future from what I'm seeing from AMD. Nothing compares to an Intel platform as it has been shown time and time again that Intel chips work best when paired together. When someone buys a complete Intel setup, they're buying reliability and performance that of which, AMD currently does not have in the mobile market.

More Information

Crap vs crap. The crap wins.

When you see one good Poorion vs good Core Duo tell it to me. In laptops battery life and graphics are more important than CPU power and AMD chipsets (ATI or Nvidia) eats battery like mad.


http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire [...] /page5.php I use computer to render in Max and gaming. My next laptop could be one Core 2 Duo in October.

Mex
More Information

Quote :

Read the whole review and make your own conclusions. 8)


I'd like to see your own conclusion.
My conclusion: They're just laptops.

Quote :

Crap vs crap. The crap wins.


Aww, I wanted the crap to win.

More Information

Cowcotland, looks like the irony is lost on you.

More Information

For power consumption, on page 8 they list the battery life for three typical tasks. Assuming the 8 cell battery is equal to about 64 whr, we get average power consumption of:

S271 (Turion)
DVD: 26.3W
Office: 24.5W
Full: 44.1W

S262 (Core Duo)
DVD: 21.8W
Office: 18.3W
Full: 33.7W

Quote :

On the other hand it is not the same with the sound harmful effects which emanate from these 2 portable computers. The S271-W1 makes a true noise of turbine since that is necessary with impressive variations whereas the S262-W1 offers a completely acceptable noise level, to see very appreciable.



The power consumption is also supported by the noise levels, where the S271 must run its fans at much louder levels to cool the hotter Turion X2.

More Information

Owned.

More Information

Quote :

For power consumption, on page 8 they list the battery life for three typical tasks. Assuming the 8 cell battery is equal to about 64 whr, we get average power consumption of:

S271 (Turion)
DVD: 26.3W
Office: 24.5W
Full: 44.1W

S262 (Core Duo)
DVD: 21.8W
Office: 18.3W
Full: 33.7W

On the other hand it is not the same with the sound harmful effects which emanate from these 2 portable computers. The S271-W1 makes a true noise of turbine since that is necessary with impressive variations whereas the S262-W1 offers a completely acceptable noise level, to see very appreciable.



The power consumption is also supported by the noise levels, where the S271 must run its fans at much louder levels to cool the hotter Turion X2.

Ye core duo is impressive for batt life. My dad's 6400 is dual core,slightly faster than 600m, has a widescreen and has a faster hdd. I dont think can compare power-wise until they finally get 65nm out the door.

More Information

9-Inch,

You should not be quoting an article to support your claims of AMD superiority which concludes that:

Quote :

Regarding the Turion 64 x2, I must say that I was expecting something (how should I put it?) a little more “exotic”, more “new”. It is in fact nothing of the sort. It's insipid, without any flavor, and overcooked, considering it came out 6 months later than Core Duo. The word "reheated" comes to mind.

More Information

Quote :

Read the whole review and make your own conclusions.



I conclude that you are full of cr@p.

More Information

Hey, there is no need to be so offensive on 9nm. This is not his first, nor the last time to post a crap. Anyway, he said nothing about which one is good and which one is not. He said that we should make our own conclusions. So we can talk about the subject and the subject is not 9nm, no matter if some dosn't like him. Right?

More Information

Oh owned again.

More Information

Quote :

Hey, there is no need to be so offensive on 9nm. This is not his first, nor the last time to post a crap. Anyway, he said nothing about which one is good and which one is not. He said that we should make our own conclusions. So we can talk about the subject and the subject is not 9nm, no matter if some dosn't like him. Right?



He asked me to make my own conclusions.

I did. Based on the article and the countless others he has posted. It isn't a question of like or dislike - yuou expressed this, I didn't.

More Information

Oh, and try to be consistent - http://forumz.tomshardware.com/har [...] 20#1122320

Some clear dislike there.

More Information

Quote :

Oh, and try to be consistent - http://forumz.tomshardware.com/har [...] 20#1122320

Some clear dislike there.


And, what kind of probelms do you have with that?