I really doubt an airbag could be strong enough to support this.
Also, if the airbag WAS strong enough, then you would STILL get crush damage in all but the slowest of crashes unless the car bumpers were beefed up in the entire area of the airbag.
It would prevent minor bumper mashing.
I don't think it is aimed at preventing damage in case of major accidents any way, however, minor bumps etc. as kaj pointed out will at least not damage anything
If both car detects imminent collision and they both generates a strong magnetic field of the same pole, that will be a different story.
Reply to Pyree
a tow bar makes people behind pay more attention.
fords new infotainmet system can provide sports results, why... when you are in the drivers seat you are driving, period.
@Pyree
Even then Newton's 3rd Law of physics will come into play, i.e. Every Action has an Equal and Opposite Reaction.
This may work, however, whats cheaper, a bumper or a really expensive airbag?
Exactly. Air bags are a use-once item. Replacement costs would exceed the cost of repair for a "minor bump".
Besides, what happens of a kid runs his bike into one of those? The bag may cause more harm then good.
Instead, how about bumpers that arnt crumple zones and made of steal like the 80's! Oh ya.
Reply to CompTIA_Rep
Here is my fender-bender ender:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marauder_(vehicle)
Reply to CompTIA_Rep
There are 46 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
