Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: ati | Themes: Business Notebooks
- 1. Market Share Vs. Market Awareness
- 2. The Current Situation
- 3. The Specifications Of Radeon IGP320M
- 4. The Test Notebook
- 5. The Innards Of The Test Notebook
- 6. The Other Test Candidates
- 7. The Other Test Candidates, Continued
- 8. The Benchmark Setup
- 9. Sandra Memory Performance
- 10. PCMark 2002 Processor Score
- 11. Application Level Benchmarks
- 12. 3D Benchmarks
- 13. Quake 3 Arena
- 14. Batterymark Scores
- 15. DVD Playback Battery Rundown Test
- 16. Impact Of Allocated Frame Buffer Size On 3D Performance
- 17. Conclusion - Radeon IGP320M Is The Chipset Of Choice For Mobile Athlon XP
- 18. More on this topic
9. Sandra Memory Performance

Those results are much more interesting than the CPU performance numbers, as they show how well (or how poorly) the memory interface of the chipset actually works. Here, Intel's 845 chipset in the Latitude C840 is able to demonstrate the full capacity of DDR-SDRAM. Unfortunately ATi's IGP320M reaches only about 56% of the i845MP score, although both are using PC2100 DDR-SDRAM. You can probably imagine that this low memory bandwidth will most likely have an impact on overall performance. VIA's KN133 chipset, as found in Compaq's Presario 725CA, is showing similar behavior. It reaches only 60% of the memory bandwidth of the i815 chipset found in the Inspirion 8100 notebook, while both are using PC133 SDRAM. An Athlon system suffering from a memory bandwidth of less than 600 MB/s is hardly able to supply impressive performance. The UMA (unified memory architecture) design of the two Athlon chipsets with the integrated graphics is costing them a significant amount of memory bandwidth. Even in 2D, the video part of the memory needs to be read out 60-85 times per second for screen refreshes, which of course generates arbitrary issues that impact system memory access.
- Previous page The Benchmark Setup
- Next page PCMark 2002 Processor Score




