Wireless Performance

By TG Publishing Team, published on December 11, 2003
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , ,

3. Wireless Performance

Testing Notes:
- All tests were run with the defaults of 54g-Auto mode and 11b protection disabled
- Frame bursting (Broadcom's Xpress technology) was not enabled
- All tests were run with the WL-100g CardBus client card's antenna in the raised position

Since the 100g was the test partner used in my review of the WL-300g Access Point, I'll just repeat the data here for convenience.

Figure 7: Four location throughput
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Although performance falls off quickly once you get a wall between the AP and client, none of the tests dipped below 14Mbps average throughput (see Figure 7). When contrasted with what I've seen in testing other Broadcom-based devices, and especially considering the 300g's antenna setup, I was pleased to see such good performance.

NOTE: Sharp-eyed readers might notice that the 27Mbps best-case throughput is significantly higher than the 20Mbps or so that I usually see from 11g products. This is the result of some experimentation that I did as part of my Atheros Super-G NeedToKnow, and what I learned will now become part of my standard test setup. The key difference was changing from Win98SE to WinXP on the Ethernet test partner. For my equipment, at least, it raised the maximum throughput about 25% from 21 to almost 27Mbps!

I checked performance in three security modes with the following results:

Mode Throughput (Mbps) % change
No security 26.6 Baseline
128bit WEP 25.9 -2.6
WPA-PSK / TKIP 20.5 -23.0
WPA-PSK / TKIP (1.6.5.3 BETA) 24.2 -9.0
WPA-PSK / AES 26.2 -1.5

These results show the expected throughput hit in WPA / TKIP mode due to the Broadcom chipset, but minimal loss running WEP or WPA with AES encryption. Another negative for the WPA-PSK / TKIP mode was that it locked up a few seconds into the test each time I tried it, requiring a reboot of the AP. However, BETA firmware that ASUS sent for the WL-300g stopped the lockup and improved the throughput as shown in the table.

While testing at Locations 3 and 4, I ran some quick tests with the 100g's antenna in the down, or folded position. Although I didn't do extensive testing, I could see a slight degradation in performance with the antenna down.

In all, very good performance for the WL-100G / WL-300G pair.

802.11g Wireless Performance Test Results
Test Conditions


- WEP encryption: DISABLED
- Tx Rate: Automatic
- Power Save: Disabled
- Test Partner: ASUS WL-300g Access Point

Firmware/Driver Versions

AP f/w:
1.6.4.7
Wireless client driver:
3.30.15.0
Wireless client f/w:
No Info

Test Description Signal Strength (%) Transfer Rate (Mbps) Response Time (msec) UDP stream
Throughput (kbps) Lost data (%)
Client to AP - Condition 1 100 26.6
[No WEP]
25.9
[w/ WEP]
1 (avg)
1 (max)
500 0
Client to AP - Condition 2 60 19 1 (avg)
2 (max)
500 0
Client to AP - Condition 3 50 15.7 1 (avg)
1 (max)
500 0
Client to AP - Condition 4 44 14.3 1 (avg)
1 (max)
500 0
See details of how we test.
Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links