AOL, Time Warner Announce Divorce

By Jane McEntegart, published on May 28, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: Business
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

After ten long years, AOL and Time Warner are saying farewell and splitting up.

TW today announced via press release (available here) that its Board of Directors had given management the thumbs up to proceed with plans for a complete legal and structural separation of AOL from Time Warner, adding that following the transaction AOL will independent, publicly traded company.

As it stands, Google owns 5 percent of AOL, which Time Warner plans to buy back in Q3 of this year. Once Google is out of the picture and once AOL is successfully separated, Time Warner shareholders will own all of the outstanding interests in AOL.

While the press release contains next to no information as to what kind of state this will leave AOL in, source told Kara Swisher over at All Things D that there are massive changes in store for the company, including putting Bebo, the company’s social networking site, and many other recently acquired companies in a separate ventures unit which will try to attract outside investment.

AOL Chairman and CEO Tim Armstrong is remaining pretty upbeat about the whole thing. “This will be a great opportunity for AOL, our employees and our partners,” Armstrong said in a statement.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

truehighroller 05/28/2009 8:52 PM
Hide
--1+

Do some research in to whether or not TW is still moving forward with their consumption based billing as I type this right now. I had an employee tell me that they are still testing it right now even though they had backlash from customers. He said he couldn't see why they would still be attempting it but, they are, his words.

Pei-chen 05/28/2009 9:00 PM
Hide
-4+

Time Warner is transferring all non-layoff-able personal to AOL so when AOL folded, Time Warner won't be blamed.

foxyg 05/28/2009 9:14 PM
Hide
-4+

both companyies suck.

AdamB5000 05/28/2009 9:26 PM
Hide
-11+

The other day I heard a commercial from Time Warner Cable trashing Verizon and their internet technical support, claiming that you can only get them from 8-4, M-F, but TWC is available until late evening.

"Who cares?," I thought. "You still suck. Bite me. Take your consumption based billing and shove it."

Whew. That felt good.

kami3k 05/28/2009 9:34 PM
Hide
-9+

Both companies suck, they belong together.

squatchman 05/28/2009 9:42 PM
Hide
-0+

Did the merger of these two companies ever make sense to anyone?

Parrdacc 05/28/2009 9:46 PM
Hide
-1+

AdamB5000 :
The other day I heard a commercial from Time Warner Cable trashing Verizon and their internet technical support, claiming that you can only get them from 8-4, M-F, but TWC is available until late evening."Who cares?," I thought. "You still suck. Bite me. Take your consumption based billing and shove it."Whew. That felt good.



Got that right. Wether I call between 8-4 M-F or later it is still the same standard of service. Which most of the time is none.

deltatux 05/28/2009 11:26 PM
Hide
-1+

Does anyone really care about AOL anymore ... the only thing I use that has any connection to AOL is AIM to talk to American friends that I know. That's really it ... oh and for iChat. Other than that AOL is basically supplanted with other companies like Google.

captaincharisma 05/28/2009 11:48 PM
Hide
-1+

I wish this would mean that Time Warner gets to keep Winamp.

ct1615 05/28/2009 11:51 PM
Hide
-1+

squatchman :
Did the merger of these two companies ever make sense to anyone?



yes, the stockholders of AOL (at the time) that made a killing of it

other then that....will go down as one of the dumbest business moves since new coke...or blockbuster attempting to purchase circuit city

jaragon13 05/29/2009 12:04 PM
Hide
-1+

kami3k :
Both companies suck, they belong together.


Hear hear!

AncientNoob 05/29/2009 12:17 PM
Hide
--3+

AOL is good because of the purchase and purchase and when they work

blackbeastofaaaaagh 05/29/2009 4:01 AM
Hide
-0+

There was a very interesting book written by some prominent journalists, shortly after the merger,"Fools Rush In."

The major force at work was an egocentric CEO, who was about to retire, desperate to leave a grand legacy for himself. He was not about to let any sane minds rain on his great fairwell parade.

apmyhr 05/29/2009 11:53 AM
Hide
-0+

Everytime I hear AOL in the news, I find myself suprised that company still exists. I guess I still use their AIM service, but even with that, I switched from AIM program to using Pidgin because it is a much smaller, lighter, and faster IM program. I made the switch after I read an interesting article which pointed out the spyware inside of AIM.

hillarymakesmecry 05/29/2009 1:30 PM
Hide
-0+

Why exactly did they combine in the first place? It always seemed like a stupid move to me. Now apparently their executives have seen the light too.

webgrunt 05/29/2009 5:58 PM
Hide
-0+

It must be hard being married to AOL. All your friends and colleagues laughing at you behind your back...

TwoDigital 05/29/2009 8:00 PM
Hide
-0+

webgrunt :
It must be hard being married to AOL. All your friends and colleagues laughing at you behind your back...


Behind your back? No... it was pretty open and in-your-face. I remember for YEARS in netnews the standard response for a dumb post in an NNTP group was, "I was going to yell at your level of non-understanding, but then then I saw you posted from aol.com. Sorry."

rooket 05/29/2009 10:44 PM
Hide
-1+

AOL still means Army of Lamers.

canceltwc4fios 06/02/2009 10:17 AM
Hide
-0+

TimeWarner recognized their tech 'support' decline was the result of inbreeding

canceltwc4fios 06/02/2009 10:19 AM
Hide
-0+

RoadRunner infrastructure is BROKEN in california... this divorce opens them up to troll for a rich mate to line their pockets, not0fix the problem, and continue taking on new customers

Sponsored links