SPECViewPerf
- 1. A New Contender: NVIDIA GeForce4 Go
- 2. Is GeForce4 Go More Than A Mobile Of Version Of The GeForce4 MX?
- 3. How Fast Do You 4Go?
- 4. When You Need To Be "Cheap" With The Battery Power, Call In The PowerMizer
- 5. When You Need To Be "Cheap" With The Battery Power, Call In The PowerMizer, Continued
- 6. NVDVD: Another Option That Might Be Coming To A Notebook Near You!
- 7. What The Future Holds
- 8. Weighty Power
- 9. Breaking In The Lid
- 10. Rigged For Networking
- 11. What Is A Final Engineering Sample?
17. SPECViewPerf

We wanted to get a feel for the performance difference in optimizations between the drivers for the test system and the A31p. Of course, the A31p features an ISV certified driver, which should give an edge on this test, and it did. Of course, when NVIDIA releases the Quadro4Go, this test will have more meaning. In the meantime, as we showed you in our testing of the A31p, it would appear that a more balanced approach to optimizing the driver has been taken by ATI. For this reason, if you run a lot of apps that are targeted for this kind of performance, looking at the Radeon Mobility 7500 might make a little more sense. On the other hand, the GeForce4 Go isn't optimized to run these kind of tests and leaves this stuff to the Quadro4Go. PowerMizer didn't seem to make much of a difference with this test either. You can gain some additional power conservation in the max battery life mode for a very small performance hit.
- Previous page 3DMark 2001
- Next page BatteryMark




