Woman Exposing Her Breasts Highlights Privacy Concerns Of Google Street View
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: Google, Street, View | Themes: The Internet
The European Union’s data protection supervisor Peter Hustinx has joined the growing chorus of calls on Google to beware the pitfalls of its street-level photographic mapping service for Google Maps.
He told reporters that Street View should not be allowed to display photos of EU citizens on the site as Google faces problems in the U.S., where it is currently compiling street-level images of 30 cities and has been brought to task and even sued by people ranging from those snapped sunbathing, coming out of a sex shop, falling off their bikes and flashing the cameras.

Google has said that it is currently working on ways to automatically blur the faces of anyone their lenses snap so as to preserve their privacy (and, in some cases, their modesty); though with one couple having sued the company simply because their house was photographed it could become a more troublesome privacy area in the future.
The company has already removed certain street-level photographs at the request of the Pentagon for reasons of national security – photographs outlining approach routes to military and critical instillations, for example.
The idea of street level mapping is welcomed by many drivers however, as it adds another layer to navigation by satellite mapping that is quite useful to many drivers.
-
Previous News Article
"World In 100 Words" Site Goes... -
Next News Article
Motherboard Wars: Asus Threatens...



We were BORN NAKED... time to realize there is nothing wrong with being SEEN naked.
Now we have Girls Gone Wild on Google Street View!!
The horror. The horror.
maybe you should just not worry about it and instead let time take its course. yeah that sounds easier.
http://streetviewgallery.corank.com
Street view is a great idea.
OMG boobs! We're all going to die now.
Then again, if they catch some 16 year old changing into a bathing suit in a European country, would Google then be producing and distributing illegal material under US law?
I guess it would depend on what angle the camera had, how old the prosecutor was, who was president, and if the media had other things to focus on at the time. Gotta love subjective laws.
I like the child porn idea though. That would be interesting.
I like the child porn idea though. That would be interesting.
I like the child porn idea though. That would be interesting.
Yes, but the real reason they are suing is that the photo proves the owners have done almost a hundred thousand dollars of improvments and not reported any of the work, nor had it approved by an inspector. They rebuilt/expanded the garage, put in a pool and deck and some other things. Those all increased the value of the property from about $85,000us to an estimated $200,000us. When their county auditor found out, they sued to back taxes, liened the proptery for uninspected additions, etc.
In short, the people who sue google really are upset they got caught doing something illegal, immoral or just plain embarrassing (to themselves).