Government Proposes That All Federal Arrestees Be Swabbed For DNA

By Humphrey Cheung, published on April 17, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Business
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

 

Washington DC - Federal law enforcement agencies could be storing the DNA of all arrestees, according to a proposed rule. The Justice Department says arrestees would have their cheeks swabbed and the resulting DNA would be entered into a national DNA database. The rule has been published in the Federal Register and awaits a 30-day comment period.

Currently only convicted felons are swabbed by federal law enforcement agencies, but the new ruling would apply to all arrestees and all federal police agencies (and boy are there a bunch of them - from US Park Rangers to Postal Police). According to Justice Department stats, federal agencies arrest approximately 140,000 people a year. The proposed rule would also affect foreigners who are arrested.

The DNA results would be entered into the Combined DNA Index System or CODIS. The system combines samples from federal and state agencies. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 44 states currently take DNA samples from convicted samples and 11 states authorize sampling from arrestees. Those include Alaska, Arizona, California, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the CODIS database has produced over 45,400 hits and helped in more than 46,000 investigations.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Google Ads

Comments

Christopher1 04/17/2008 5:22 AM
Hide
-0+
Christopher1

Personally, I don't like this. When a person has been convicted of a crime, I think it is okay to take their DNA and put it in a database, but then only if they are convicted of forcible rape... anything else, no, I don't think it should go into any government database.

Christopher1 04/17/2008 5:22 AM
Hide
-0+
Christopher1

Personally, I don't like this. When a person has been convicted of a crime, I think it is okay to take their DNA and put it in a database, but then only if they are convicted of forcible rape... anything else, no, I don't think it should go into any government database.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads