EA to Activision: No Leadership
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: E3, Activision, Games | Themes: Digital Entertainment
Electronic Arts took a shot at Activision and Vivendi’s decision to drop out of the Entertainment Software Association and future E3 shows.
Jeff Brown, EA vice president of corporate communications revealed to GamesIndustry.biz that both Activision and Vivendi’s departure from ESA was due to “lack of leadership” within the publishers.
"They’re a big company and we feel that when you’re a big company you’ve got a responsibility to consumers to work on policy issues which are very, very important to consumers. And the best way to do that is with an industry consensus. That’s the way it’s been done with the ESA in the US, and with ELSPA in the UK,” explained Brown.
Brown went on to add, “We hope that others don’t do that, but I think that the onus is on the ESA to prove that membership in it is good for the company and good for consumers. And I think we’re going to see the ESA redouble its efforts to prove that.” Brown’s statements appear to hint towards supporting theories behind Activision and Vivendi’s departure. Insiders originally believed ESA had been inactive in lobbying for the greater good of the industry.
Nearly half of dozen publishers declined to exhibit at this year’s E3, while Activision and Vivendi took it one step further by exiting the association. Both publishers cited business and financial reasons for their departure. Last week LucasArts also revealed they were not going to renew their membership with ESA. However, the publisher will continue to exhibit at E3 2008.
The glamour of E3 has been dwindling for the past couple of years, but Brown and EA remain optimistic about the upcoming show and its future. “"EA is 100 percent committed. There’s Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, THQ, Disney, a bunch of others – and I assume all the others are still locked into it," brown said.
-
Previous News Article
AOL Seals The Deal On... -
Next News Article
Afghan Receives Death Penalty...


They don't need leadership, they've got Blizzard
Blizzard alone > EA.
+1 on that, Once EA stops destroying successfull franchizes (C&C) and stops releasing unpolished hyped up games (Crysis), then they can attempt to criticise leadership of other better developers like Blizzard and Activision, both of whom have an excelent reputation with releasing high calibor quality games. After all, its not like Activision or Blizzard needs to advertise their next batch of games, any fan would already be watching them closely, especially in the WoW crowd. Shelling out the cash for E3 would be redundant and unnecessary for these companies. Long past are the days that I would look forward to E3, I believe the joy of E3 left when I made the jump from Consoles to PC gaming.
Exactly "Locked Into It". As soon as their contract is up more studios will be leaving.