Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No
Ads

DSLR Roundup

- by

5. Canon Rebel T1i

We take a look at five entry-level Digital Single Lens Reflex (DSLR) still cameras, from brands including Nikon, Canon, Olympus and Sony.

HD Video at 20 fps


One of the most highly-anticipated new features of the Canon Rebel T1i is the addition of Full HD 1080p video. Unfortunately though, the new video mode isn't quite as promising as it sounds. For starters, the camera's software doesn't allow for a frame rate of above 20 fps at this resolution, which begs the question why Canon didn't at least try and push it to 24 fps.

In our tests, most of our videos were jerky and pretty disappointing. We eventually fell back to a resolution of 1280 x 720 at 30 fps. Video produced at this setting is excellent from the start, although the H.264 compression enscapulated as a .MOV file isn't the easiest format to handle on a Windows PC.

When it comes to sound recording, the T1i begins to show its limitations as the built-in microphone only captures mono audio and there's nowhere to plug in an external microphone.

Finally, although you can use Autofocus while filming, it's very slow and produces a lot of background noise, so it's still better to focus manually before you press Record than waiting until the camera is already rolling.

The Rebel T1i from Canon is a great addition to its collection of mid-range digital SLRs.  The new camera is well-built, with a 15 Megapixel CMOS sensor, a large 3'-inch 920,000 pixel screen and Full HD video.

Handling

It's hard to avoid comparing the T1i with its predecessor, the Rebel XSi. The basic structure of the two cameras is identical, and they are almost exactly the same size.  What has changed, though, is Canon's choice of materials.  While the XSi sometimes felt a little lightweight, the T1i is a more serious proposition, and we liked the new, more comfortable grip, which makes handling the camera much easier.

In general, the interface is much the same, with only a few small changes in the camera's controls.  The white balance control, for instance, has moved to the four-way control joystick, leaving room for the record button.  At the same time, the click wheel at the top of the camera now gives direct access to video mode.  Both of these modifications make it easier to switch between taking still photos and recording video, one of the key new features of the T1i.

We would have welcomed some more significant changes, such as adding a second scroll wheel on the back of the camera.  The ISO control is at the front of the grip, meaning it can quickly adapt to ambient light conditions, even if reaching it isn't very easy.

Although the XSi also had a 3-inch screen, the T1i now has a VGA resolution of 640 x 480 pixels, which is much easier on the eye.  Using the menus is much easier, and photos appear sharper.  Two proximity sensors automatically turn the screen off when you bring the viewfinder up to your eye to save battery life and avoid distractions.

Focusing has changed little either with manual focusing still a treat.  The mirrors produce a nice bright image in the viewfinder that's a pleasant 0.87 x version of what's falling on the sensor.  

The same nine-point autofocus system struggled a little in some of tests, in particularly on still-life scenes.  We found that we had to take the same shot several times, sometimes abandoning contrast-detection autofocus and just focusing manually.  Hopefully the production version of the T1i will resolve some of these problems.  

In Live View mode, where the shot you're about to take is represented on the screen rather than in the viewfinder, autofocus is not much faster than on the XSi.  Despite the inclusion of face detection, the contrast detection that forms the basis of Canon's autofocus is too slow for everyday use and is best-suited to indoor environments. When the autofocus is based on phase detection, instead, the T1i performs much better, even in low light.  

Image Quality

The sensor on the T1i isn't quite the same as the one on the 50D, which was faster and with a powerful set of microlenses.  Nevertheless, the test shots we took with our prototype T1i were pretty impressive.  Electronic interference is well-handled right up to 1600 ISO, and you can certainly make use of photos taken at 3200 ISO.  Above that, at 6400 ISO and 12800 ISO should be used with more caution, with noticeable blurriness and several dead pixels.

Such high settings are a welcome addition, though, and are useful in low light and work well for black and white.

For the most part, having a 15 Megapixel sensor is more a marketing coup than a surefire sign of better quality photos.  Indeed, taking such high-resolution snaps can be counter-productive, as it can lead to JPEGs that are anywhere from 4 to 11 MB and RAW files of up to 30 MB.  Saved at a color depth of 14 bits, these huge RAW files should, in theory, produce excellent images, but it's hard to see a real improvement in most photos.

Some useful auto correction systems are available, which picks out more details in darker areas at the expense of a slight loss of overall contrast.

The lens that ships with the T1i (a 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS) is already available and well-known.  It's the same lens that comes with the XSi and gives great quality photos for the price.  Photos are nice and sharp and the optical stabilization is excellent.

New on the T1i is an automatic correction for vignettes caused by a large range of lenses, but Canon is yet to develop a system to account for the various chromatic distortions that various lenses are known to produce.

One final point to note is that the T1i comes with a very complete set of software which allows you handle RAW files, organize your photos and remotely control the camera itself.

Canon Rebel T1i/500D
Pros
Cons
  • Excellent image quality up to 1600 ISO
  • Great manual focusing
  • HD Video (1280 x 720) at 30 fps
  • 3'' VGA screen
  • Well-finished and easy to hold
  • Only one scroll wheel
  • Autofocus is still too slow in Live View
  • Some problems with focusing
  • Full HD video only works at 20 fps
  • No wireless flash control, no sRAW support

Here's our verdict for the time being: this preview vesion of the 500D doesn't represent a revolution in the world of digital SLRs, but it's a great camera that's a pleasure to use. Although the 15 Megapixel sensor doesn't swing it, the ability to go all the way to 3200 ISO (and beyond) without adversely affecting the quality of the image, the 3'' VGA-quality screen and HD video are all certainly welcome additions.

Share:
14
Comments
X

Comment:

Read the comments on the forums
themadmanazn 10/05/2009 2:34 AM
Hide
-0+

no canon?

jkcajkca 10/05/2009 4:01 AM
Hide
-0+

I was expecting the Nikon D5000 and the Canon EOS 500D/T1i REBEL to be included in this roundup.....

Anonymous 10/05/2009 4:04 AM
Hide
-2+

failed.. EP1 is not a DSLR.

deforrest 10/05/2009 5:25 AM
Hide
-0+

no canon??? What is up with that? I am thinking of upgrading my rebel XTi. Nice post but incomplete. Way to go Tom

GeoMan 10/05/2009 9:14 AM
Hide
--1+

You title an article DSLR roundup and omit Canon? Seriously, what’s up with that?

GeoMan 10/05/2009 9:42 AM
Hide
-0+

Seeing as this is a cut and paste job from Digital Versus and they have a very good range of cameras in the complete review would it have been that much more effort to add some more cameras for completeness.

For anybody interested the full article is here

(sorry for the double post but I since I can’t edit my 1st post I have to add a 2nd

dconnors 10/05/2009 11:01 AM
Hide
-1+

Hey guys,

We just added the Rebel T1i to the story. It should have been there in the first place.

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/DSLR-C [...] 419-5.html

Sorry about the delay/mix up!

-Devin

TunaSoda 10/05/2009 3:04 PM
Hide
-0+

Nikon D90...

oldscotch 10/05/2009 3:11 PM
Hide
-0+

Couple of comments:
The Olympus E-P1 is not a SLR, when you're talking focus, live view and the like, it is functionally very different from an SLR.

Where is the Pentax Kx, or at least K2000?

You've failed to give credit to Sony and Olympus (and Pentax) for their sensor based stabalization which works with almost any lens.

What are the parameters of your image quality test? Are these jpegs straight from the camera? Raws processed in lightroom, what?
An almost monotone crop might give some idea of noise, but nothing of colour, dynamic range or contrast. A noise free image at iso 3200 sounds great, but that doesn't do a lot of good if you've compromised colour saturation to do so.
The Canon looks like it's losing detail as low as iso400 - or maybe it's not in focus, it's hard to tell.

omnimodis78 10/05/2009 4:00 PM
Hide
-0+

I used to sell cameras in the retail market and I used to laugh every time a self proclaimed professional came in and wanted the "best camera" which, according to them, was the one with the highest megapixel count. This is why I really admired Nikon for putting out the D40 - because they actually gave beginners/casuals a solid (still solid to this day) DSLR for super cheap because it was 6.1MP instead of the 10.1 which was the trend at it's release. I still use my D40 and it's great!

michaelahess 10/06/2009 10:13 AM
Hide
-1+

I agree with omnimodis78. My wife's D300 is nice and all but my D40 is so simple and easy to use, also so much smaller and lighter. Only photographers can see the diff in picture quality, which unfortunately includes most of her family.....

testerie 10/06/2009 11:40 AM
Hide
-0+

I am giving comment for different scenario.

warezme 10/06/2009 4:06 PM
Hide
-0+

What no 5D MKII? just kiddin

JWL3 10/06/2009 9:35 PM
Hide
-0+

Canon didn't include 24fps 1080p video shooting on the T1i because they were saving that feature for the more expensive 7D.

7D is about twice the price as the T1i but it still doesn't include a full frame sensor. Why are the most desirable things always the most expensive??? (rhetorical question)