Roundup: Compact Digital Cameras : Olympus Stylus Tough 8000

By Digital Versus, published on June 16, 2009
Powered by Digital Versus

26. Olympus Stylus Tough 8000

No Charger

One unusual aspect of the Stylus Tough 8000 is that it comes without a battery charger. Instead, a mains adaptor is supplied that allows you to charge the camera with its USB port.

What's even more unusual is that this adaptor can only recharge the camera's batteries, nothing else. You can't use the camera while it's plugged into the mains without using another adaptor, available separately from Olympus.

A lot of photographers choose to buy a second battery for their camera, so they can keep using it while the other battery is being charged. Unfortunately, that won't work with the Stylus Tough 8000, which stays put while you charge it up.

If you're one of those people who likes to keep using your camera all day long and you've got your heart set on this camera, you'll need to buy yet another accessory, an external charger for your second battery.

Traditionally a leading manufacturer of waterproof digital cameras, Olympus has updated its selection of all-terrain cameras, adding the 'Tough' collection at the beginning of 2009.  The top-of-the-range Stylus Tough 8000 is certainly solid: it can go underwater to depths of 33 feet, fall from a height of 6 feet, withstand the cold up to -10 °C and resist being crushed by a weight of up to 100 kg.  That's all well and good, but it remains to be seen whether or not it's still a good buy at a time when other manufacturers like Fujiflm, Panasonic and Canon are working on tough compact cameras of their own.

Handling

The cameras in the new Stylus Tough range all have a similar well-designed flat frame.  They are impeccably put together, and the metal exterior contributes to the impression that these are solid cameras.  A raised part at the front of the camera on the right hand side makes handling it much easier than on the earlier model, the Stylus 1050 SW, which slipped out your hands very easily.  The lens is now protected by an automatic cover, which means that you no longer run the risk of having it slip open at the bottom of your bag or in your pocket.


Olympus has kept the controls largely the same, and there are no big surprises.  While the Stylus Tough 8000 is much faster than the model it replaces, it still struggles to keep up with the most powerful 'regular' digital cameras, with the delay between saving one photo and being able to take the next particularly long. 

Other features have been improved though, including the addition of a 28-mm wide-angle lens, which makes this camera a lot more useful than its predecessors.  There's also a new intelligent automatic mode, a feature now found on almost all of Panasonic's cameras, but less frequently with other manufacturers.  The version included here is nowhere near as powerful as on a camera like the Panasonic FS7.  It can generally identify the correct scene mode,  but it sometimes takes a very long time.  It doesn't get it right every time, either: at night, for example, it often defaults to 'night portrait', which involves turning on the flash, even when shooting a landscape.

The real problem is that the intelligent auto mode doesn't allow any manual settings at all.  On a Panasonic camera, you can ask the iA mode only to choose from scene modes that don't use the flash.  Here, with things 100-percent automatic, you need to switch back to manual mode to make any changes at all.

Image Quality

Is a 12 Megapixel sensor that much more demanding?  Or did we just get unlucky with a duff camera?  Either way, the Stylus Tough 8000 that we tested consistently gave worse results than the Stylus Tough 6000, despite having the same lens.  The image stabilization didn't really do its job, and the only way to get a sharp portrait was to set the exposure time to just 1/15s, requiring a speed of 1600 ISO. 


There are no innovations in noise handling, with graininess visible from 400 ISO, and very noticeable beyond that.  Moreover, the focus never quite seems perfect, even in the center of the frame.  The sensor's dynamic range is also limited, with bright areas lost too easily.  Chromatic aberration gets special mention: in this 100-percent reproduction of an A4 print the problems are all too obvious.

Olympus still lags behind with video, with no resolution above 640 x 480 available, and clips are, infuriatingly, limited to ten seconds, unless you're using an xD card. 

Another irritating anachronism is the lack of an auto-rotate for your photos... hasn't Olympus realized that some people want to take portraits?

Olympus Stylus Tough 8000
PlusesMinuses
  • Waterproof up to 10 metres, shock-resistant
  • Solidly built and stylish
  • 28 mm wide angle lens
  • Faster than earlier models
  • External battery charger sold separately
  • No automatic image rotation
  • Photo quality could be improved
  • Disappointing Intelligent Auto mode
  • Only compatible with xD memory cards (MicroSD with adapter)
The Myu Tough 8000 is an extension of Olympus' collection of all-terrain cameras, and it's definitely a step in the right direction with a wide-angle lens, better grip and more responsiveness. It still lags behind land-based digital cameras, but good performance underwater wins it an extra star.
Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

zodiacfml 06/18/2009 4:56 PM
Hide
-0+

should have classified the cameras to at least price and/or final rating. i got discouraged to read.

Tomsguiderachel 06/18/2009 7:42 PM
Hide
-0+

zodiacfml :
should have classified the cameras to at least price and/or final rating. i got discouraged to read.


When you say classified, what do you mean? Do you mean the pages should go in order of price, or in order of rating? Such as the cheap ones at the beginning and the expensive ones at the end OR the best cameras at the top and the worst cameras at the bottom?

zodiacfml 06/19/2009 2:26 PM
Hide
-0+

i meant group them by chosen price ranges/brackets or any feature you think is relevant since comparison between cameras is just difficult with the present format wherein it is only possible to compare models of a certain brand.

Aragorn 06/19/2009 3:56 PM
Hide
-0+

It would have been nice if all the cameras were given scores (yes I know this is very subjective, but so are all the comments and pro/con sections). Idealy they would be given su scores as well (i.e. a still picture score, a video score, a asthetics score, a usablity score, maybe some others) and then the cameras could be sorted by those scores with links, maybey a short blurb at each camera in the sorted list. Another thing that would be very usefull to myself and I assume other readers is a features table that allows us to compare all the cameras.

Sponsored links