2. Nikon Coolpix S1000pj
Two camera giants, two point-and-shoots over $300. Will the projector-equipped S1000pj prevail, or will the "standard" features on the S90 win out?
The Projector
The video projector built into the S1000pj, not surprisingly, is fairly limited. The definition is limited to VGA and the brightness tops out at 10 lumens. Living-room projectors produce over 1,000 lumens!
That means the room you’ll be doing your projecting in has to be really dark. Once you’ve darkened the room, any plain white surface will do as a screen. You just press a button, adjust the focus, and browse at will, either using the buttons on the camera or the remote control.
You can move from one picture to another, zoom and move around within a picture, and play video files – though the sound quality from the built-in speaker is very limited. In short, it has everything you need to show your shots and movies to your friends. As far as the projector goes, despite the inevitable technical limitations, the camera delivers what it promises.
At a time when all – or almost all – compacts have a 5x optical zoom, a 12 MP sensor, a 2.7-inch or 3-inch display screen, and similar size and cost, it’s getting hard to set yourself apart from the pack. Nikon is taking a long shot – a digital camera with a built-in video projector. It’s an original solution that makes the Coolpix S1000pj unique among the hundred or so cameras released in 2009.
Handling
With its Picasso-style nose in the middle of its face and second eye above, the Nikon S1000pj is instantly recognizable. We’ll let you decide how elegant-looking you think it is, but just about everyone on the team here found it extremely ugly.
The metal body looks sturdy, but the build quality isn’t perfect. The fit of the battery compartment lid, for example, isn’t great – on our test model, it tended to stay closed even when unlatched.
At the rear is a 2.7-inch 230,000 dpi LCD screen, with a highly visible weave and pronounced clouding in shadows. Even worse, since it’s a TN panel-based display, so everything becomes dark – and thus useless – when taking a downward-angled shot. For the rest, the S1000pj is laid out like other Coolpix models. Operation is simple and the interface is clear, if not elegant. The new controls related to the inclusion of the projector (see inset) are located on the upper part of the body.
The remote control that comes with the camera works in projector mode, of course, but also in snapshot mode. So you can use it to control the S1000pj (including the zoom) remotely, which may be an interesting feature for tripod users. However, it’s very plastic-looking construction and mediocre surface finish are disappointing.
Response
T he S1000pj’s responsiveness inspires no particular comment. Start-up is a little quicker than average, and focusing is neither slow nor fast. The delay between shots is a little long (2.5 seconds), and the burst mode is really quite disappointing. It’s slow – barely over one frame per second – and it hangs after the fifth frame.
Image quality
We’ll cut to the chase: If the S1000pj has a weakness, this is it. The lens really lacks evenness, especially at wide-angle, with a fairly good centre but edges that are particularly fuzzy. Purple fringing is very visible at high contrast, even on medium-sized prints. In telephoto, the contrast is never good, even in the center, and the purple fringing is no fainter.
For sensor sensitivity, Nikon isn’t among the best. Purplish zones in darker areas, a chronic weakness of this little 12 MP, already appear at 400 ISO, along with the first evidence of smoothing intended to contain digital noise. From 800 ISO, details are diluted. We’ll be charitable and not even mention the higher values.
Video
Video is not a strong point either. The 640x480 non-HD definition is unexciting, the recorded sound is mediocre, and the optical zoom doesn’t work during recording and the image shows clouding in the shadows. The video performance is no worse than with a lot of compacts, true; but some do much better.
| Nikon Coolpix S1000pj | |
|---|---|
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
With the S1000pj, Nikon is trying out a new concept: “Your personal theater on the go” – a camera that lets you show your photos and video to your friends. Unfortunately, this doesn't overshadow the fact that the camera is just plain mediocre.
- 1. Canon PowerShot S90
- 2. Nikon Coolpix S1000pj





Why is it that on every article the 'More on this topic' link never works and fails to load? Had the same trouble with the Nokia N900 article and others too.
Where is the Panasonic Lumix line at? Preferably DMC-ZS3
Please note that the distortion correction sidebar is incorrect. When shooting raw files with the S90, Adobe's Lightroom 2.6 and the Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in 5.6 will provide geometric distortion correction results to raw files similar to the native JPEG files and raw files processed by Canon DPP.
Regards,
Tom Hogarty
Adobe Systems,
Lightroom, Camera Raw, DNG Product Manager
Nice to know that Adobe has their finger on the pulse...
Ya pretty stupid article, the Nikon PJ is a new concept and for the tech to make projection there is ALOT of compromise to still be compact, they are comparing apples and oranges here...
I read the full review, but one thing wasn't explained: why put these 2 cameras head to head? The Nikon is a new-concept camera, and so it really shouldn't be put side by side with a rather orthodox canon model. Sort of devalues the objectivity of this site, and the validity of its author.
Wow, this article is really pathetic. Just stay out of camera comparisons if this is the quality to expect. Leave it up to dpreview and similar sites that are dedicated to that hardware.
Agree with Kaiser_25 and Omnimodis79, the comparison is not appropriate. Canon S90 should be compared to Panasonic LX3.