Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No
Ads

Blu-ray Player Showdown

- by

5. Sony BDP-S350

The Remote

As useful as the remotes that Panasonic supplies--only more stylish--Sony's remote controls suffer from the same weakness: they don't have backlit buttons, which is a real annoyance if you want enjoy the true Home Cinema experience of watching movies in the dark.

The glow-in-the-dark labels used by Samsung to solve the same problem don't even get a look-in either.

With the BDP-S350, Sony is adding to the competition in the entry-level Blu-ray player market, where the market is already heating up with the Samsung BD-P1500 and Panasonic DMP-BD35.

Like the earlier S300, the new S350 is very shallow, meaning it should slide into even the smallest of spaces. 

At the back, the same set of input and output ports is there, including HDMI 1.3, composite and component video, an RJ45 Ethernet port, analog stereo and a USB host.



For some reason, this USB port is set very deeply and not all flash memory drives will fit.  If we were being cynical, we might accuse Sony of making the decision on purpose given that its own USB keys are the perfect size for it.

For digital audio, there's both an optical and a coaxial output.  Sony has also included an S-video port, an interesting decision that bucks recent trends.  You get the most out of a HD player using a HD TV and naturally enough, an HDMI cable.

The interface used is once again the famous XrossMediaBar system which made its debut on the PlayStation 3, and it's just as quick and intuitive as ever.  Just because it's simple to use though, doesn't mean it's not powerful: it even allows you to set the brightness of the LCD display on the front, or turn it off altogether for a real home cinema experience.

Apart from DTS-HD MA, the S350 can decode just about every audio format, meaning you can even connect a HDMI amplifier to enjoy PCM sound.  If you have an amplifier that does its own decoding, you will probably prefer to opt for a bit-stream signal.

The absence of 5.1 or 7.1 connectors means that you can't use older DD or DTS audio equipment, as only the 'core' Dolby signal is available via the optical or coaxial audio cables.

Test Results

This player does pretty well when it comes to actually reading Blu-ray discs, with a delay of “only” 53 seconds before showing the first frame of our test movie.  Very few players get under the symbolic barrier of one minute, and only the PlayStation 3 is truly impressive, at just 35 seconds.

The quality really is High Definition, with images that are as good as the competition from Samsung and Panasonic.  It seems that now that Blu-ray is becoming a mature standard, video quality is becoming a less important criterion for distinguishing between models as improvements take hold all around.

Upscaling of Standard Definition sources is equally impressive.  If we wanted to be really picky, we could suggest that it was just a notch behind the Panasonic BD55, but there's very little in it.  Either way, we couldn't identify any genuine problems with the S350's excellent work on this front.

What we were disappointed--or rather, confused--by was the fact that the S350 isn't compatible with DiVX or MP3 files. Although they aren't necessarily the most up-to-date codecs, a lot of people still swear by them. None of Sony's competitors have been foolish enough to leave out these important formats, either.

Sony BDP-S350
Pros
Cons
  • One of the quickest players off the mark when you insert a disc
  • Excellent picture qualty
  • Brightness control for front display
  • Incompatible with DiVX and MP3 codecs
  • Cannot decode DTS-HD MA
  • USB host port set far too deep--except for Sony's own USB keys, that is

This is a very good Blu-ray player from Sony, whose main failing is the absence of DiVX compatibility, which is found almost universally amongst the competition.

Share:
8
Comments
X

Comment:

Read the comments on the forums
p05esto 10/13/2009 1:25 AM
Hide
-0+

Why not review the 3600 sammy? The ability to connect to a PC share with NO software or special configuration on the home network is amazingly nice and simple. I can browse my collection of DIVX movies (hundreds) and play them without a hitch. I have no reason for a home theater PC when this player can connect to my 5-year old home seerver pc and play it's content so nicely.

Do these devices spellt he end of the home theater PC? On the 3600 I can download NetFlix, Blockbuster, player Pandora internet radio and watch YouTube videos for hourssss (very addicting). What can a HTPC do that this player can't? Just a question for THG.

matt87_50 10/13/2009 2:16 AM
Hide
-1+

I still recommend the PS3, even if the person has no interest in games.
specially the newer, quieter one with bitstream. great at BD, great media streamer, and they are always updating it and adding new stuff.
the only reason I'd get a standalone is if I already had an xbox that does all that stuff except bluray.

mtn ranger 10/13/2009 7:07 PM
Hide
-0+

The BD60 does NOT play DIVX/XVID files, only the BD80. Secondly, you can burn AVCHD camcorder files (Canon HF100) to a DVD and play on my BD60.

I think its a good player. Some people have been reporting that it has a random skipping problem.

dachande73 10/15/2009 5:18 PM
Hide
-0+

Ok, where is the OPPO BDP-83 review?

dachande73 10/15/2009 5:20 PM
Hide
-0+

Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, Pioneer....bleh. I have an OPPO BDP-83. Plays anyting I throw at it and has excellent dvd upconversion.

pdesai2019 10/22/2009 4:26 PM
Hide
-0+

Why wasn't Oppo reviewed? It is a great player and not that expensive.

pdesai2019 10/22/2009 4:27 PM
Hide
-0+

Why wasn't Oppo reviewed?

Anonymous 11/08/2009 6:08 PM
Hide
-0+

mtn ranger
Could you please advise how to create the AVCHD DVD?
I am using multiAVCHD and Imgburn and I only get a black screen, no image, no sound..