By
Harald Thon,
published on February 12, 2003
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 4x4 | Themes: Business Notebooks
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 4x4 | Themes: Business Notebooks
Contents
- 1. P4-M: The CPU For The Full-Sized Consumer Notebook
- 2. Compared: 1.4, 1.7, 1.8 And 2.2 GHz Mobile Pentium 4-M Vs. Desktop CPU
- 3. Pentium 4-M Consumption Modes: What's Behind TDP & Co
- 4. Energy-Saving Technologies In The Pentium 4-M: Enhanced Speedstep, Deeper Sleep & IMVP
- 5. Why Does The P4-M Permit A Higher Maximum Junction Termperature?
- 6. The Test System: Asus L3C
- 7. Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- 8. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 9. Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
- 10. Video Encoding With Virtual Dub 1.4.1
- 11. File Compression: Winace 2.2
- 12. Open GL Games: Quake3 Arena
- 13. System Performance: Sysmark 2002
- 14. Battery Tests - Run-Down Times For Games, Presentations And DVD Playback
- 15. Conclusion: High Clock Speed Is Not Always The Best Choice
- 16. More on this topic
8. Synthetic Benchmarks
SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU, Multimedia And Memory


There are no surprises with the results of the CPU arithmetic and multimedia benchmarks using Sandra 2003. A processor's FPU and integer units work more rapidly when the speed is raised.

The measurement of the memory bandwidth shows that the memory interface of the 845MP really gets down to business. The values lie at 2000 MByte/s and are thus very close to the theoretical maximum memory bandwidth of 2100 MByte/s (DDR2100 RAM).
What appears to be higher memory throughput on a slower CPU compared with one running at a higher speed is a measurement uncertainty produced by Sandra 2003. This phenomenon occurs frequently with Sandra, but is no reflection of reality.
- Previous page Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- Next page Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002




