By
Harald Thon,
published on February 12, 2003
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 4x4 | Themes: Business Notebooks
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 4x4 | Themes: Business Notebooks
Contents
- 1. P4-M: The CPU For The Full-Sized Consumer Notebook
- 2. Compared: 1.4, 1.7, 1.8 And 2.2 GHz Mobile Pentium 4-M Vs. Desktop CPU
- 3. Pentium 4-M Consumption Modes: What's Behind TDP & Co
- 4. Energy-Saving Technologies In The Pentium 4-M: Enhanced Speedstep, Deeper Sleep & IMVP
- 5. Why Does The P4-M Permit A Higher Maximum Junction Termperature?
- 6. The Test System: Asus L3C
- 7. Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- 8. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 9. Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
- 10. Video Encoding With Virtual Dub 1.4.1
- 11. File Compression: Winace 2.2
- 12. Open GL Games: Quake3 Arena
- 13. System Performance: Sysmark 2002
- 14. Battery Tests - Run-Down Times For Games, Presentations And DVD Playback
- 15. Conclusion: High Clock Speed Is Not Always The Best Choice
- 16. More on this topic
11. File Compression: Winace 2.2
Archiving files is a typical application. For this test we used a 178 MB WAV file that we compressed as far as possible with Winace.

Here, too, a clearly faster processor brings considerable advantages.
3D Performance
Direct-3D Performance: 3D Mark 2001 SE

As the results of the synthetic 3D benchmarks 3D Mark 2001 SE show, a faster CPU only increases speed at lower resolutions. This benefit disappears at higher resolutions. This shows that the fastest CPU means nothing if the graphics bus system doesn't perform just as nimbly.
- Previous page Video Encoding With Virtual Dub 1.4.1
- Next page Open GL Games: Quake3 Arena




