Avira Antivir Personal Free Edition v9.0.0386: The Best of the Freebies
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 2009, antivirus, test | Themes: Software
- 1. One-Stop Comparison for 14 Anti-Virus Titles
- 2. Anti-Virus Basics
- 3. Comodo Internet Security v3.8: The Newbie
- 4. Avira Antivir Personal Free Edition v9.0.0386: The Best of the Freebies
- 5. Clamwin Free Antivirus 0.94.1: Open Source Protection Software
- 6. Avast! 4.8 Home Edition Free: The Classic
- 7. BitDefender Total Security 2009: A Balanced Choice
- 8. F-Secure Internet Security 2009: A Disappointment
- 9. Trend Micro PC-Cillin Internet Security Pro 2009: A Reasonable Option
- 10. McAfee Internet Security 2009: Very Complete
- 11. Norton Antivirus 2009: The Choice For Ease and Simplicity
- 12. Panda Global Protection 2009: An Outsider Who’s Left In The Dust
- 13. G-Data Total Care 2009: The Heavy Weight Of Security
- 14. ESET Smart Security 4 (Nod32 Antivirus 4): A Positive Evolution
- 15. Kaspersky Antivirus 2009: A Half-Colored Version
- 16. AVG Internet Security v8.5 (paid version): An Insufficient Evolution of What You Can Get For Free
- 17. The Verdict
- 18. The Test Protocol
- 19. More on this topic
4. Avira Antivir Personal Free Edition v9.0.0386: The Best of the Freebies
This software was the absolute best of the free anti-virus wares in our evaluation in 2008, and after testing it again this year, Antivir’s supremacy has become incontrovertible.
An Interface that is Both Clear and Functional
Simplified almost to the extreme, Antivir can't match the fancy designs that some commercial-grade anti-virus software offers. However, the choice of sober colors makes for very easy readability, and although there aren’t very many functions available, the essentials are all there. This minimalist approach allows for simple and intuitive navigation of this software.
The default settings suffer from two major problems that are, fortunately for Antivir, fairly easy to remedy. First, you have to activate the scan files in the Configuration/Scan menu and then check “all files” in the Configuration/Guard menu to begun a scan. Secondly, it is a pity that Antivir's developers chose quickness over security as a default, and that they didn’t decide to give the user the option of protecting his or her settings with a password. On the other hand, the possibilities that are available to personalize your settings are interesting and easily allow for various technical settings to be configured with only a little technical knowledge.
High-End Protection
When scanning the hard drive, the detection engine finds viruses easily, as long as it doesn’t mistake some of your normal files for threats (for Excel files containing macros, you need to study the Help menu options). We strongly advise that you do NOT automatically delete all the files that Antivir picks out because, occasionally, the files are not in fact infected (again, this mostly has to do with Excel files).
We should also tell you that although this was a problem when we tested this anti-virus software, subsequent versions might not act this way.
If you decided not to follow our advice and have instead continued to use the default settings, the resident protection of Antivir will give you adequate protection. However, if you do activate the “all files” option in the Configuration/Guard menu, you’ll get protection that rivals that of the best paid-for anti-virus software offerings.
In fact, Antivir's protection features act very efficiently in a proactive manner and, despite the absence of an email scan, it directly gets rid of infected messages on the hard drive. It’s true that you can no longer read the message in question, but at least the threat has been taken care of.
A Light Load on Resources
While using Antivir, the extra time it takes for Windows to start up is negligible, making it about 6% slower. The duration of the scan is only 21 minutes and, despite its efficiency, it only mobilizes a small part of the processor’s and memory's resources. The uninstall process is also something other developers should copy, as it leaves not even the slightest trace on your PC.
Conclusion
Antivir offers amazing performance, especially considering that it's free. While some small adjustments to its features–such as the addition of a firewall–would have been welcome, its really impressive protection features and the simplicity of its interface have sold us.
- Previous page Comodo Internet Security v3.8: The...
- Next page Clamwin Free Antivirus 0.94.1: Open...







And here I thought AVG Free was the best free antivirus.
Kaspersky internet security/ anti-virus does not look like that.. what the heck
No NOD32?
What about Microsoft's own Oncecare
These guys sound like they don't know what they are talking about. They claimed that Avast skips text files even though "they are a classic refuge for malevolent programs." Text files cannot be executed and therefore cannot contain viruses. The pictures they have are different as well. In any case I am a happy user of Avast and prefer it to McAfee and Norton but have not tried the others.
the picture they use for Avast is with a different skin. You can switch the skin at anytime.
I m using avast home too. I think the scanning for HD is bit longer and taxing a lot on my P4 2.6. But its free..no complain...
what about Kespersky ??? lol so much missing good antivirus software
Spanish Kespersky = norman?
French... T_T?? not english there we go
KASPERSKY Ftw ...
what I used to like on Tom's site was the use of graphs... can't find any in this round up. More over how the can you judge resident scan performance just on start up time? What about disk R/W after all services have been initialized?
Anyway quite poor article
I use Norton NIS 2009, and have had problems that made me look for another. When I saw this article, I said "Great timing lol !"
Unfortunately, there is nothing in this article that inspires confidence in either the comparisons or the conclusions. There are comments about Norton that my personal experiences tell me are incorrect (at least in the US).
And, as said before, no tables, etc.
Very disappointing.
@Shadow703793: NOD32 is in page 14
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-a [...] 15-14.html
@romain_75: Kaspersky in page 15
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-a [...] 15-15.html
@shurcooL: So do I, use AVG for last 3 years thinking it was best one.
May be good time for change ...
eset smart security 4!!!and zone alarm extreme security 8
I'm very surprised to hear that Norton is not a resource hog. It is the reason I switched to free AV software like Avast and AVG. I'm not going back to Norton even if they paid me...OK I might consider it.
Why do you have pictures of Kaspersky on the page with AVG antivirus?
haha kapersky became norman.. avg became kepersky.. lol
Was this review bought or something? For Norton to get such a good review I am leaning towards it being bought. I mean c'mon, Norton not being a resource hog and stealing your system. How do you expect us to believe that?
Why not review Kaspersky Internet Security, instead of just the Antivirus, when the Internet Security package for other brands were reviewed?
Also, The KAV Internest Securitiy is $54.99 at Walmart. The review stated it was double.
I seriously have my doubts and found myself shaking my head after reading the reviews for several of the products in here.
I'm surprised you didn't give a "Best Value" award... I'd say for best value go with Trend Micro, for less than $20 you can get protection for 3 PCs for one year (Look online you will find it). I use it on all my computers and no complaints.