Norton Antivirus 2009: The Choice For Ease and Simplicity

By Tom's Guide France, published on May 21, 2009
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Software

11. Norton Antivirus 2009: The Choice For Ease and Simplicity

The heyday of Norton Antivirus, one of the oldest and probably the most well-known security software offerings, has long since past. However, although nowadays it is often overtaken by its competition with regards to performance, it has remained among the highest selling programs on the market. So how does its 2009 edition match up?

User-Friendly Software


The first glimpse of this software, after inserting and installing it on your computer, is satisfying and the quality of the graphics doesn’t disappoint at any point during the process. The presentation and management of the different functions are clear and intuitive, and advanced options are interesting without being too much to handle. Advanced users who are not information security specialists, as well as novices desiring to better their appreciation for security, will both appreciate the program’s simplicity. The presence of password protection settings also shows off Norton’s concern with quality.

Intriguing Performance

The threat-detection engine works rather well during the scans but it lets certain file formats systematically pass though, a glitch that separates it from its best competitors. The resident protection is also very effective, although a little slow.
The defense system that works against infected email attachments is well thought out–the email remains readable while the file itself is neutralized and replaced with a piece of text explaining the event. It is a shame, however, that Norton is not equipped with an automatic scan feature for external hard drives.

Very Slight Impact On The PC



Norton Antivirus 2009 surprised us the most with its ability to not disrupt the normal functioning of a running PC–sensitive but light, Windows start-up time is drawn out only slightly (+31%) with respect to its competitors. The duration of the hard drive scan, though a bit greedy for power and resources, is one of the three most rapid programs tested (21 minutes, the fastest being 20 minutes). The cherry on top is that the uninstall process is almost perfect (only two keys left on the register), which is a real novelty compared to its predecessors.

Conclusion


Even if the performance of Norton Antivirus 2009 is not totally at the level of its best competitors, this new version is a wonderful surprise. The software is a pleasure to use, its settings are easy to master, and it is not very power-hungry–it will give happiness to a large audience, especially those who have older machines. The price is also very reasonable and the principle index tools come in the package. It is unfortunate, however, that there isn’t a firewall. It is present in the Internet Security Version (which is two times more expensive), bringing its price a little below the cost of the average anti-virus software tested in this roundup.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

shurcooL 05/21/2009 11:58 PM
Hide
-1+

And here I thought AVG Free was the best free antivirus.

Doctor Rob 05/22/2009 12:30 PM
Hide
--1+

Kaspersky internet security/ anti-virus does not look like that.. what the heck

Shadow703793 05/22/2009 12:46 PM
Show
spydeyrch 05/22/2009 12:56 PM
Hide
--2+

What about Microsoft's own Oncecare

Anonymous 05/22/2009 1:14 AM
Hide
-0+

These guys sound like they don't know what they are talking about. They claimed that Avast skips text files even though "they are a classic refuge for malevolent programs." Text files cannot be executed and therefore cannot contain viruses. The pictures they have are different as well. In any case I am a happy user of Avast and prefer it to McAfee and Norton but have not tried the others.

Anonymous 05/22/2009 1:35 AM
Hide
--1+

the picture they use for Avast is with a different skin. You can switch the skin at anytime.
I m using avast home too. I think the scanning for HD is bit longer and taxing a lot on my P4 2.6. But its free..no complain...

romain_75 05/22/2009 1:37 AM
Show
IzzyCraft 05/22/2009 1:42 AM
Hide
--1+

Spanish Kespersky = norman?

IzzyCraft 05/22/2009 1:43 AM
Hide
--1+

French... T_T?? not english there we go

Ciuy 05/22/2009 1:57 AM
Show
Anonymous 05/22/2009 3:37 AM
Hide
--1+

what I used to like on Tom's site was the use of graphs... can't find any in this round up. More over how the can you judge resident scan performance just on start up time? What about disk R/W after all services have been initialized?
Anyway quite poor article

Twoboxer 05/22/2009 6:28 AM
Hide
-3+

I use Norton NIS 2009, and have had problems that made me look for another. When I saw this article, I said "Great timing lol !"

Unfortunately, there is nothing in this article that inspires confidence in either the comparisons or the conclusions. There are comments about Norton that my personal experiences tell me are incorrect (at least in the US).

And, as said before, no tables, etc.

Very disappointing.

goose man 05/22/2009 8:05 AM
Hide
-0+

@Shadow703793: NOD32 is in page 14
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-a [...] 15-14.html

@romain_75: Kaspersky in page 15
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-a [...] 15-15.html

@shurcooL: So do I, use AVG for last 3 years thinking it was best one.
May be good time for change ...

dandy 05/22/2009 8:17 AM
Show
lumpoco 05/22/2009 9:31 AM
Hide
-6+

I'm very surprised to hear that Norton is not a resource hog. It is the reason I switched to free AV software like Avast and AVG. I'm not going back to Norton even if they paid me...OK I might consider it.

Anonymous 05/22/2009 9:39 AM
Hide
-0+

Why do you have pictures of Kaspersky on the page with AVG antivirus?

Anonymous 05/22/2009 9:52 AM
Hide
-0+

haha kapersky became norman.. avg became kepersky.. lol

falchard 05/22/2009 2:58 PM
Hide
-5+

Was this review bought or something? For Norton to get such a good review I am leaning towards it being bought. I mean c'mon, Norton not being a resource hog and stealing your system. How do you expect us to believe that?

Anonymous 05/22/2009 5:06 PM
Hide
-0+

Why not review Kaspersky Internet Security, instead of just the Antivirus, when the Internet Security package for other brands were reviewed?

Also, The KAV Internest Securitiy is $54.99 at Walmart. The review stated it was double.

I seriously have my doubts and found myself shaking my head after reading the reviews for several of the products in here.

bigbadbrad 05/22/2009 5:37 PM
Hide
-1+

I'm surprised you didn't give a "Best Value" award... I'd say for best value go with Trend Micro, for less than $20 you can get protection for 3 PCs for one year (Look online you will find it). I use it on all my computers and no complaints.


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links