Couple Add-A-Phone Questions

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

I currently have two phones on my account, and will be adding a third
tomorrow. I'm just wondering if they still charge the $36.00 activation fee
for the third line. I know when I added my second one there was no charge -
it was charged as 36.00 then credited back on the same bill - does this hold
true for adding additional lines? If so, is there any chance they'd see fit
to waive it?

Second, my new cycle started today, however, I'm going to add the phone
tomorrow. Will this mess up my ability to view my usage online, for either,
or both of my current two lines? I know making changes to your plan screws
it up, but I know there have been times when changes have been made, and I
can still at least view usage for one of the two lines, and still see my
usage for both lines.

Thanks
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <x2QOc.3637$_25.2621@fe2.texas.rr.com>,
Boxermanboxermansr@none.of.yours.com says...
> I currently have two phones on my account, and will be adding a third
> tomorrow. I'm just wondering if they still charge the $36.00 activation fee
> for the third line. I know when I added my second one there was no charge -
> it was charged as 36.00 then credited back on the same bill - does this hold
> true for adding additional lines? If so, is there any chance they'd see fit
> to waive it?

By policy, as long as you sign a 2-year agreement, the
activation fee is waived.

>
> Second, my new cycle started today, however, I'm going to add the phone
> tomorrow. Will this mess up my ability to view my usage online, for either,
> or both of my current two lines? I know making changes to your plan screws
> it up, but I know there have been times when changes have been made, and I
> can still at least view usage for one of the two lines, and still see my
> usage for both lines.
>

It counts as a plan change and so, yes, the system will not
break down your usage.

--
RØß
O/Siris
-+-
**A thing moderately good is not so good as it
ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a
virtue, but moderation in principle is always a
vice.**
-Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. 1792-
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <x2QOc.3637$_25.2621@fe2.texas.rr.com>,
Boxermanboxermansr@none.of.yours.com says...
> Thanks
>

Oh wow, it's going to be a while before I see the post, but
I just posted that "we" do this, didn't I?

Habits die hard. Sorry. I do *not* work for Sprint PCS
any longer.

--
RØß
O/Siris
-+-
**A thing moderately good is not so good as it
ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a
virtue, but moderation in principle is always a
vice.**
-Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. 1792-
 

Jim

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
730
0
18,930
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

O/Siris <0sîrîs@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message news:<MPG.1b75ee6d7f0c5b75989a4e@netnews.comcast.net>...
> In article <x2QOc.3637$ 25.2621@fe2.texas.rr.com>,
> Boxermanboxermansr@none.of.yours.com says...
> > Thanks
> >
>
> Oh wow, it's going to be a while before I see the post, but
> I just posted that "we" do this, didn't I?
>
> Habits die hard. Sorry. I do *not* work for Sprint PCS
> any longer.
>
> --
> R
> O/Siris
> -+-
> **A thing moderately good is not so good as it
> ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a
> virtue, but moderation in principle is always a
> vice.**
> -Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. 1792-

So put it in your .sig and forget about having to mention it 'manually'?