Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (
More info?)
Well failing to provide any info on what you need, here are a couple of
things that show what it comes with, is not as good as it gets.
PocketBreeze to make the info on your Today screen actually useful
PocketPlus to give you program management conveniently, extend your PIE
functions and add value to the Today screen
Resco Explorer to give you a file explorer that works more like the one you
are familiar with on the desktop, and make network access more friendly
Repligo to give you the ability to take anything you could print with you
and refer to it.
HttpMail so you can access HTTP mail boxes (Hotmail, MSN mail) with the
Inbox function off-line rather than having to be on the net.
After that we need to know if you hate the built in Word Processor, Picture
Viewer, Music Player, all of which have options available for improvement.
Do you need databases, mapping, network management tools/utilities? For
grins, go to www.handango.com, select Windows Mobile and search for
something. It's amazing what you can find if you look.
--
Sven, MS-MVP Mobile Devices
"Mike Henley" <mnhenley@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6005702b.0408211904.62ae1b40@posting.google.com...
> "AlanS" <news@remove.abyz.fslife.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<cg74ad$4om$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>...
> > "Mike Henley" <mnhenley@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:6005702b.0408202342.7b77b021@posting.google.com...
> > > Got calligrapher 7.3 a few days ago and i'm quite impressed with it.
> > > What other cool pocketpc 2003 apps, of any genre, am I missing out on?
> >
> > What are you interested in? If you don't say you may not get
recommendations
> > in those areas, and you'll waste peoples time in areas you aren't
interested
> > in.
>
> I never knew i wanted calligrapher till i tried it. I had thought the
> graffiti or thumbboard was as good as it gets. So no, I'd rather not
> specify beyond what I did in the OP.
>
> >
> > There have also been a number of times in the past that recommendations
> > have been given, why not try looking through the newsgroup archives?
>
> Perhaps a more up-to-date one.