Budget laptop for playing BF3 at high/ ultra setting

Kpssandhu

Honorable
Aug 24, 2012
12
0
10,560
Hello,
I am going to buy new laptop for work and entertainment, I already have gaming pc at home on which I play BF3 and many more games.
I am looking for decent laptop which can handle games like BF3 with decent Fps at 760p.
Screen 14 in. Max
Should be light to carry.
Reasonably priced.
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960
I haven't had overheating issues with any AMD APUs. That was an issue several years ago, but not with AMD's APUs. Diablo 3 is a very light game and you'd probably be able to play it in 1080p without a problem if the display went that high in resolution. BF3 should be fine in your requested resolution, although it might be better with a discrete card in CF with the A8s or A10s.
 

amk09

Distinguished
Mar 29, 2010
87
0
18,590


+1 if you want to play bf3 on ultra then go with this laptop. the 660m is a beastly little notebook gpu.
 

PCgamer81

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2011
40
0
18,590

At the laptop's native resolution (1600x900) this laptop has no chance of maxing out BF3 at a respectable frame-rate.

OP: I am afraid that you are going to be looking at shelling out at least cool grand and a half if you want a brand new laptop capable of maxing BF3 at a decent frame-rate and decent resolution.

If I were you, I would go with this...

http://www.avadirect.com/gaming-laptop-configurator.asp?PRID=23907

That will do quite nicely for maxing out BF3 on the go.
 

PCgamer81

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2011
40
0
18,590

You do realize that particular mobile chip is integrated with the processor, right?
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960
The Radeon 7970M is probably a better way to go than the GTX 680M. Its generally a lot cheaper, yet is an often better performing card, mostly due to it having far higher memory bandwidth. The GTX 680M is like a GTX 660 Ti, except with even weaker memory bandwidth. I don't recommend it at all. I'm not saying that it won't make someone happy, but it is not the best option.
 

PCgamer81

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2011
40
0
18,590

The laptop I linked is available with either chip.

Personally, I am not sure that bandwidth is that important on a mobile display. But I could be wrong.

In any case, the Clevo comes with either.
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960


Memory bandwidth is the only significant difference between the GTX 680M and the GTX 670. It obviously makes a difference because of the huge deficit in performance between them. Using good AA, the 680M crawls in comparison to 7970M.
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960


A $500 desktop can be built to handle BF3 excellently (even in MP) at 1080p. Budget laptops and BF3 don't go together very well, but low-budget desktops can easily be built with BF3 in mind.
 

PCgamer81

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2011
40
0
18,590

On that particular notebook it is.

343434343435555.jpg
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960


There isn't a single laptop that has any Nvidia graphics integrated into an Intel CPU. It can be integrated into the motherboard, but it can't be integrated into the CPU. That link is either wrong or referring to something else.
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960
Also, Optimus is switchable graphics, not graphics that is integrated into the CPU. Switchable graphics is when a powerful GPU can be switched for a weaker, lower power consumption GPU depending on the workload. That's what Optimius does.
 

PCgamer81

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2011
40
0
18,590

If what you say is correct, the seller is flat wrong, or worded it wrongly.

That description falls under the Nvidia 660m header, that's why.

In any case, that's not the laptop to get based on the OP's demands.
 

blazorthon

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2010
761
0
18,960


The best IGP of any Intel CPU is the HD 4000. None of Intel's CPUs have a Nvidia IGP. I think that they just meant to say that the 660M is integrated into the motherboard. I'll look into this to confirm/deny it for sure, but I'm absolutely sure that it is not integrated into a CPU. That would be a very large CPU die, especially for a mobile CPU. Although Intel puts up with Nvidia, they only do so because the alternative is working with AMD. Intel kinda hates Nvidia and the chances of them working together on such a project are slim to none, especially with AMD's APUs only seeing limited commercial success.