does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing..
- Thread starter Guest
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Home Theatre Tivo Video
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
> Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
> anything to the B-drive?
No.
> nt
Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
--
Lenroc
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
> Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
> anything to the B-drive?
No.
> nt
Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
--
Lenroc
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
>
> > Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
> > anything to the B-drive?
>
> No.
>
> > nt
>
> Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
--
-------------------- http
/NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
>
> > Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
> > anything to the B-drive?
>
> No.
>
> > nt
>
> Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
--
-------------------- http
/NewsReader.Com/ --------------------Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
> What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
"nt" stands for "no text". It means the subject is the question.
It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
the reply when you compose a followup, and so it makes for an illogical
post.
A web forum is something like http/www.tivocommunity.com/ or
http/www.dealdatabase.com/forum.... an online message board. I brought
it up here because "nt" is a common method of posting on web forums (fora?).
--
Lenroc
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
> What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
"nt" stands for "no text". It means the subject is the question.
It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
the reply when you compose a followup, and so it makes for an illogical
post.
A web forum is something like http
/www.tivocommunity.com/ orhttp
/www.dealdatabase.com/forum.... an online message board. I broughtit up here because "nt" is a common method of posting on web forums (fora?).
--
Lenroc
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
the reply when you compose a followup"
thanks for the education!
"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
the reply when you compose a followup"
thanks for the education!
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On 17 Mar 2005 07:24:24 -0800, wamanning@gmail.com wrote:
>"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>the reply when you compose a followup"
>
>thanks for the education!
if only he would educate the Top Posting Twits in this
NG.
Sean
On 17 Mar 2005 07:24:24 -0800, wamanning@gmail.com wrote:
>"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>the reply when you compose a followup"
>
>thanks for the education!
if only he would educate the Top Posting Twits in this
NG.
Sean
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:09:05 -0700, Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
>
>> Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
>> anything to the B-drive?
>
>No.
>
>> nt
>
>Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
Please don't pretend to be some kind of usenet cop......
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:09:05 -0700, Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:04:20 -0800, wamanning wrote:
>
>> Subject: does tivo ALWAYS try to fill up the A-drive before writing
>> anything to the B-drive?
>
>No.
>
>> nt
>
>Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
Please don't pretend to be some kind of usenet cop......
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:12:42 -0500, Mark wrote:
> Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
>
> Please don't pretend to be some kind of usenet cop......
Thank you for sharing with the world your inability to tell the difference
between a polite request and what you call being a "usenet cop".
The OP was not similarly confused, thankfully.
--
Lenroc
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:12:42 -0500, Mark wrote:
> Lenroc <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Please don't use "nt". This isn't a web forum.
>
> Please don't pretend to be some kind of usenet cop......
Thank you for sharing with the world your inability to tell the difference
between a polite request and what you call being a "usenet cop".
The OP was not similarly confused, thankfully.
--
Lenroc
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
"Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
>
>> What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
>
> "nt" stands for "no text". It means the subject is the question.
>
> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
> the reply when you compose a followup, and so it makes for an illogical
> post.
>
> A web forum is something like http/www.tivocommunity.com/ or
> http/www.dealdatabase.com/forum.... an online message board. I brought
> it up here because "nt" is a common method of posting on web forums
> (fora?).
>
> --
> Lenroc
Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be requesting
that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and include
his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want, Lenny.
"Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
>
>> What's 'nt' & 'web forum'? ( Yes, I don't know )
>
> "nt" stands for "no text". It means the subject is the question.
>
> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
> the reply when you compose a followup, and so it makes for an illogical
> post.
>
> A web forum is something like http
/www.tivocommunity.com/ or> http
/www.dealdatabase.com/forum.... an online message board. I brought> it up here because "nt" is a common method of posting on web forums
> (fora?).
>
> --
> Lenroc
Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be requesting
that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and include
his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want, Lenny.
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
* Sean wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
> On 17 Mar 2005 07:24:24 -0800, wamanning@gmail.com wrote:
>>"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>>the reply when you compose a followup"
>>thanks for the education!
> if only he would educate the Top Posting Twits in this
> NG.
That wasnt a top post, twit.
--
David
It pays in England to be a revolutionary and a bible-smacker most of
one's life and then come round.
-- Lord Alfred Douglas
* Sean wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
> On 17 Mar 2005 07:24:24 -0800, wamanning@gmail.com wrote:
>>"most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>>the reply when you compose a followup"
>>thanks for the education!
> if only he would educate the Top Posting Twits in this
> NG.
That wasnt a top post, twit.
--
David
It pays in England to be a revolutionary and a bible-smacker most of
one's life and then come round.
-- Lord Alfred Douglas
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
* Kenny wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
> "Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
[...]
>> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>> the reply when you compose a followup,
[...]
> Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be requesting
> that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and include
> his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want, Lenny.
Do you always have such problems reading? I left only the part above
that pertains to your assertion.
Perhaps a visit to the eye doctor?
--
David
Neckties strangle clear thinking.
-- Lin Yutang
* Kenny wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
> "Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
[...]
>> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>> the reply when you compose a followup,
[...]
> Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be requesting
> that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and include
> his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want, Lenny.
Do you always have such problems reading? I left only the part above
that pertains to your assertion.
Perhaps a visit to the eye doctor?
--
David
Neckties strangle clear thinking.
-- Lin Yutang
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
"SINNER" <99nesorjd@gates_of_hell.invalid> wrote in message
news:861rg2xo63.ln2@news.gates_of_hell.com...
>* Kenny wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
>
>> "Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>>> the reply when you compose a followup,
>
> [...]
>
>> Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be
>> requesting
>> that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and
>> include
>> his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want,
>> Lenny.
>
> Do you always have such problems reading? I left only the part above
> that pertains to your assertion.
>
> Perhaps a visit to the eye doctor?
> --
> David
> Neckties strangle clear thinking.
> -- Lin Yutang
How many neckties are you wearing?
So if the OP simply stops using 'nt' how does this help the problem? If a
reply doesn't include the subject (because of the newsreader) then the same
problem that Lenny bitched about is still happening because there's still no
text.
"SINNER" <99nesorjd@gates_of_hell.invalid> wrote in message
news:861rg2xo63.ln2@news.gates_of_hell.com...
>* Kenny wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
>
>> "Lenroc" <lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:x_9_d.12364$ZE5.10828@fed1read03...
>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:01:13 +0000, PHIL wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It's annoying, because most newsreaders don't put the subject as part of
>>> the reply when you compose a followup,
>
> [...]
>
>> Then shouldn't you ('cuz you're the one with the "nt" problem) be
>> requesting
>> that the OP not only not use "nt" but that he also not be lazy and
>> include
>> his question as the body of his post? Be clear about what you want,
>> Lenny.
>
> Do you always have such problems reading? I left only the part above
> that pertains to your assertion.
>
> Perhaps a visit to the eye doctor?
> --
> David
> Neckties strangle clear thinking.
> -- Lin Yutang
How many neckties are you wearing?
So if the OP simply stops using 'nt' how does this help the problem? If a
reply doesn't include the subject (because of the newsreader) then the same
problem that Lenny bitched about is still happening because there's still no
text.
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
to clarify, the OP (me) wasnt "confused", he was merly not aware of the
limitations of most newsreaders that make use of "nt" less than popular
on usenet.
;-)
-w
Lenroc wrote:
>
> The OP was not similarly confused, thankfully.
>
> --
> Lenroc
to clarify, the OP (me) wasnt "confused", he was merly not aware of the
limitations of most newsreaders that make use of "nt" less than popular
on usenet.
;-)
-w
Lenroc wrote:
>
> The OP was not similarly confused, thankfully.
>
> --
> Lenroc
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter