H!
Here, have a look at this article:
http/www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-physx-ati,5764.html
Then you can go to the site ngohq.com. There you won't find any Physx for the ATI like claimed in the article.
My question is, did nVidia realise, that saying CUDA is for everybody (meaning all companies) was a mistake, and then they gave that guy a goodly amount to stop his work? And is that why we don't have a Physx driver for the ATI cards?
I have wondered this for too long now. Two years may be. Because not only there wasn't a Physx driver for the ATI, but also there was absolutely NO information on that even at that time. (I remember asking them about it then, through their online form, but it went without a response.)
Thanks
Here, have a look at this article:
http/www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-physx-ati,5764.html
Then you can go to the site ngohq.com. There you won't find any Physx for the ATI like claimed in the article.
My question is, did nVidia realise, that saying CUDA is for everybody (meaning all companies) was a mistake, and then they gave that guy a goodly amount to stop his work? And is that why we don't have a Physx driver for the ATI cards?
I have wondered this for too long now. Two years may be. Because not only there wasn't a Physx driver for the ATI, but also there was absolutely NO information on that even at that time. (I remember asking them about it then, through their online form, but it went without a response.)
Thanks