buying a new GPU

LordVi

Estimable
Oct 9, 2015
42
0
4,580
hello,
i am currently using GTX 750 TI but i can't play games on Ultra and 1080p res.
i am thinking of buying a new GPU (nvidia only) but i am confused between GTX 970 or GTX 980 TI.. i want a gpu for upcoming games too. I'll b buying a 4K monitor later this year too. Will any of these cards perform well with 4K ?
 
Solution
If it has to be ultra you might as well get the 980Ti, even at 1080p. If you are ok with very high to ultra then a 970 is fine for 1080p but full ultra is very demanding in some games.

My big concern is your PSU, the CX range are low quality with a bad reputation for failing in gaming builds. Gaming PC's spend long periods under high load, you want a high quality stable unit. CX are tier 4 http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-2547993/psu-tier-list.html

A PSU when it fails can damage other components including GPU. A high end gaming rig needs an equally high end PSU

utroz

Distinguished
Nov 9, 2010
90
1
18,610
The 980Ti is by far the better card but 4K is very hard on GPU's so even it is not enough for true 4K gaming without lowering the image settings. Many people who want to run 4K have to get 2x 980Ti's in SLI. Pascal is coming soon and is supposed to be more 4K oriented and AMD is coming out with Polaris which is also supposedly 4K oriented. This is just my opinion and it could be way off. Anyone else have any thoughts?
 

ktolo

Honorable
Jul 19, 2012
31
0
10,610
AMD Fiji based cards handles 4k better than current nVidia cards, no question.
R9 390X or Fury will get the job done.

I'd be inclined to wait 3-4 months and get the next gen (Polaris from AMD or Pascal from nVidia)
 

sizzling

Distinguished
If it has to be ultra you might as well get the 980Ti, even at 1080p. If you are ok with very high to ultra then a 970 is fine for 1080p but full ultra is very demanding in some games.

My big concern is your PSU, the CX range are low quality with a bad reputation for failing in gaming builds. Gaming PC's spend long periods under high load, you want a high quality stable unit. CX are tier 4 http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-2547993/psu-tier-list.html

A PSU when it fails can damage other components including GPU. A high end gaming rig needs an equally high end PSU
 
Solution

Mr Kagouris

Estimable
Sep 7, 2015
141
0
4,710
Yep as sizzling said, while the CX is unlikely to become a hazard (at least not an explosion-grade hazard) to other components, it'd be best if you replaced it before putting in a high performance card. And as otherwise mentioned, unless you need CUDA for something else, there is absolutely no valid reason to not get something like a Fury X instead since it's a better card in more ways than one.

Raw performance was practically the same between 980 Ti and Fury X on launch (Fury X coming out on top in some instances, 980 Ti in others) but since then new drivers and DX12's Async Compute feature (which is not universally adopted but may become more widespread when Pascal and Polaris come out) has given pretty much all non-ancient AMD cards a performance boost (the stronger the card the bigger the boost).

And the "nvidia has better drivers" and "developers favor nvidia" arguments are both practically myths. There's pretty much just as many games where AMD comes out on top, and while nVidia has historically been quicker to fix driver issues, they are not immune to screw-ups (see recent driver update screwing up nVidia systems and the "fix" not fixing much at all).

tl;dr Unless you need CUDA for programming/rendering/whatever there's no logical reason to get a 980 Ti over a Fury X.
 


LIST your entire computer hardware configuration....
because a new GPU might just be a waste of money.
You NEED a CPU and motherboard which is capable of supporting the graphics.
If you don't have that, you are throwing money away for nothing.

A new GPU does NOT cure an obsolete motherboard or an obsolete processor.
Listen to what I say.