I wouldn't go for the Acer if its much more. The Acer's CPU is a low power model so the battery will probably last longer. Normally it would give lower performance because the CPU runs at 1.8Ghz. However, during most processes your system will idle and run at a lower speed regardless of what system. Also when you do push it, the Acer will overclock itself up to 2.5Ghz and at this point be the equal of the i3 in the Toshiba.
If they are the same price, just based off the information posted, I would get the Acer because it will most likely give better battery life with little to no drop in performance.
If the Acer is more than $20 more expensive, I would not bother because the best performance the Acer can give is equal to the i3, and thats after it raises its power consumption to increase the speed, giving you a negligible lower power consumption when you are running intense programs, and equal if not very slightly worse performance. While not using intense programs you will using reasonably less power with the same performance.
One other thing, I just mention as a forethought. IF you are comfortable working on computers or know someone who is, I might have a laptop CPU for sell that you could buy either of those computers most likely and put in for more performance at a low price. My laptop which works perfectly fine I am thinking of upgrading the CPU is the reason I mention it.