Intel 4000 HD or Nvidia GeForce gt710m?

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510
On Monday, I will be buying an Asus. Problem is that I have the choice of 2 Asus to buy.

Both basically have the same features (Processor Intel Core i5-3337U / 2.7 GHz) yet one has Intel HD 4000 Graphics while the other has Nvidia GEForce gt710m.

I will not be playing games or very rarely (online). Mostly for work (90%+) and a few movies once in a while (streaming).

the GeForce is a notebook while the other is an ultrabook (sleaker).

Which would you choose? there is about 50$ difference - the notebook is 50$ cheaper than the ultrabook.

thank you for your constructive comments and advice,

Vince
 
Solution
Does the Ultrabook have an SSD? If the Ultrabook has an SSD then definitely get it. The notebook is more powerful but sense you're not a gamer you don't need the slightly faster GPU. What you want to get is the one with the most battery life and quicker load times. You would benefit more from an SSD than a faster GPU. If the Ultrabook doesn't have an SSD then check the battery life estimates of both computers. If battery life is equal and the ultrabook doesn't have an SSD then the notebook is the better choice due to its superior graphics card and cheaper price. So, from a purely technical perspective the notebook wins in that case but that's not all you need to consider. Consider the designs of each computer too. The one that you think...

penn919

Distinguished
Aug 24, 2010
6
6
18,515
If gaming isn't important and assuming none of your work apps are graphics intensive, then it really doesn't matter which one you buy because they'll perform the same. If you could mention the primary apps/games you intend to use it might better help gauge which one would be a better fit.
 

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510


Hi Penn919, thank you for your answer. All I am using is word and excel, a lot of web searches and research, and streaming movies at night.

Not sure how to answer your question as I don't play games really. Yet streaming videos is very important on my free time.

thank you once again,
Vince
 

penn919

Distinguished
Aug 24, 2010
6
6
18,515


In that case it doesn't matter which you get because in terms of performance they'll be essentially the same. What little performance gain you would get with the gt710m is meaningless if you don't use any graphic intensive apps. Netflix and general video steaming isn't intensive enough to make a difference. I guess it comes down to which form factor you prefer. I'd personally go for the ultrabook because I like smaller sleek designs, but just choose which ever suits you.
 

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510


Much appreciated Penn919. I will go for the sleeker design as not going to play games. Yet nervous for my streaming experience but I have done some readings and the 4000 should not affect quality.

Thanks once again!

Vince

 

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510


Hi Jaguar,
Thank you for your answer and question. I am looking at an Asus X552CL Notebook versus the same build yet ultabook with HD 4000, Asus S56CA. I doubt you will find info as I am in Switzerland and the codes dont seem to match with North America, Both have Intel Core i5-3337U / 2.7 GHz. Price 599 swiss francs or 670usd

 

kaswyn

Distinguished
Dec 1, 2007
88
0
18,610
vexv1970, I would get the one with the GT 710m. Why? Because it's better. Period. What if 3 months after you purchase the ultrabook, you decide you want to start taking loads of pictures with a semi pro Nikon or Canon camera and take 1080p videos? You'd want the one that gives you future proof.

Having said that, ultrabooks are sleeker and lighter in general than notebooks. But they also generally lack a good dedicated GPU. Ultrabooks arose from the fall of netbooks (their predecessor). Now no one wants to buy my little dumb netbook with it's little pathetic Intel Atom CPU and some cheap integrated video card. Who's to say ultrabooks will still stick around in 5, or even 3 years? Notebooks have been around for a LONG time and will most likely be around after all the dust settles.
 

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510


Interesting point of view Kaswyn. Back to the drawing board hehe.
I have another computer for pictures and the likes. My main concern is work (outlook, Word and Powerpoint) and obviously my streaming capabilities.

I will seriously tthink things over (the pros vs the cons), yet my decision is gearing towards the ultrabook (hd 4000).

I appreciate your feedback. Food for thought... grrrr

Vince


 

theonerm2

Distinguished
Dec 28, 2009
55
0
18,610
Does the Ultrabook have an SSD? If the Ultrabook has an SSD then definitely get it. The notebook is more powerful but sense you're not a gamer you don't need the slightly faster GPU. What you want to get is the one with the most battery life and quicker load times. You would benefit more from an SSD than a faster GPU. If the Ultrabook doesn't have an SSD then check the battery life estimates of both computers. If battery life is equal and the ultrabook doesn't have an SSD then the notebook is the better choice due to its superior graphics card and cheaper price. So, from a purely technical perspective the notebook wins in that case but that's not all you need to consider. Consider the designs of each computer too. The one that you think you will feel more comfortable holding, typing on, and looking at is probably more important than better specs in this case. The CPU is more important than the GPU for streaming purposes and sense both CPU's are the same then it doesn't matter here. This choice doesn't hinge so much on which computer has the faster graphics card.
 
Solution

vexv1970

Honorable
Dec 7, 2013
7
0
10,510



Yes it has SSD. Nice that is really putting the answer into perspective as it comes down to these components! Definitely the ultrabook fits my needs. Thank you for getting back to me on this one.
Kindly and season's greetings!
Vince