most of it is still test render,
seeing the difference between uncompressed lossless video and a pass through handbreak
and i am haveing a problem
im useing sony vegas 11 as my editing program, i know it can use the gpu, but i have no idea how much that effects it.
see i have 6 minutes of 1080p video
it takes almost 24 minutes to render out (discounting the errors which forced me to render it 5 times trying to fix)
if i move that 6 minutes to 720p (still 1080, but rendered out to 720)
it takes 10-14 minutes
if i just go with the cpu only it takes about 18 minutes.
i have to ask, is it really useing my gpu (5770 1gb)
would a better gpu render things out faster?
is there any kind of calculator i can use to try and balance cost benefit?
on steam i was told to try vdub... my problems are these, and almost a direct copy from the steam thread
"does it use a gpu to make rendering faster
will it use all my cores
is there a way to make the user interface better? what i really like about vegas is that i drag my files to it, i cant see all of the videos i drag there, and editing them is just as easy, while vdub... i have no idea if i can even composit 3 videos together and mix several audio tracks, i record in in a compressed lossless format, and i record dual audio tracks, one of me on a mic, and one with game audio only, and if i have to i cut my audio and replace it with something i record later on
from what i can tell, it only uses the cpu, but that said, i am able to use the h.264xfw codec for output and even rendering 1080p, it outputs it at almost as fast as it can play... i may have to really look into vdub, but like i said, i need more out of it than it is currently showing me it can do."
the videos i am editing are either dual audio through handbrake, or dual audio from dxtory using the Lagarith Lossless Video Codec
any help is appreciated.
seeing the difference between uncompressed lossless video and a pass through handbreak
and i am haveing a problem
im useing sony vegas 11 as my editing program, i know it can use the gpu, but i have no idea how much that effects it.
see i have 6 minutes of 1080p video
it takes almost 24 minutes to render out (discounting the errors which forced me to render it 5 times trying to fix)
if i move that 6 minutes to 720p (still 1080, but rendered out to 720)
it takes 10-14 minutes
if i just go with the cpu only it takes about 18 minutes.
i have to ask, is it really useing my gpu (5770 1gb)
would a better gpu render things out faster?
is there any kind of calculator i can use to try and balance cost benefit?
on steam i was told to try vdub... my problems are these, and almost a direct copy from the steam thread
"does it use a gpu to make rendering faster
will it use all my cores
is there a way to make the user interface better? what i really like about vegas is that i drag my files to it, i cant see all of the videos i drag there, and editing them is just as easy, while vdub... i have no idea if i can even composit 3 videos together and mix several audio tracks, i record in in a compressed lossless format, and i record dual audio tracks, one of me on a mic, and one with game audio only, and if i have to i cut my audio and replace it with something i record later on
from what i can tell, it only uses the cpu, but that said, i am able to use the h.264xfw codec for output and even rendering 1080p, it outputs it at almost as fast as it can play... i may have to really look into vdub, but like i said, i need more out of it than it is currently showing me it can do."
the videos i am editing are either dual audio through handbrake, or dual audio from dxtory using the Lagarith Lossless Video Codec
any help is appreciated.
/www.sonycreativesoftware.com/GPU_power_in_Vegas_Pro_11
Facebook
Twitter